Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Latest NewsPay & benefitsMinimum wage

Retail body demands fundamental review of NMW

by dan thomas 5 Dec 2005
by dan thomas 5 Dec 2005

The British Retail Consortium (BRC) has called for a ‘fundamental review’ of the ultimate goal of the National Minimum Wage (NMW).

In its submission to the Low Pay Commission, the BRC said an increase to £5.35 in October 2006, could lead to about 35,000 jobs being lost and could create an additional cost of £1.13bn to the retail sector.

In a recent BRC survey on the impact of the NMW, submitted to the commission in evidence, 11% of the retailers surveyed said they would consider job cuts if the proposed 6% increase to £5.35 goes ahead in October 2006. The survey also revealed that the rise to £5.05 has already cost retailers £1.21bn.

BRC director-general, Kevin Hawkins, said: “At its current level the NMW is now having a serious impact on retailers of all sizes. Most retailers have been cutting their prices and given the outlook for consumer spending, expect to continue doing so.

“They simply cannot go on absorbing further increases in their fixed costs – of which labour is one of the biggest,” he said.

The TUC hit back, insisting that there is no economic case for not going ahead with the proposed increases, with economic growth continuing and inflation still low.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

TUC general secretary, Brendan Barber, said: “Millions of low-paid workers are reliant on the minimum wage rising realistically every year.


“If employer lobbyists get their way and the minimum wage increases at a slower rate or is frozen, it is these people and their families who will suffer.”

dan thomas

previous post
NHS to send in specialist squads to overcome budget problems
next post
Ballot papers sent out over DWP job cuts

You may also like

Day one rights in the Employment Rights Bill...

28 Aug 2025

EHRC acts on policies flouting law on single-sex...

28 Aug 2025

Medical profession more ableist than wider society: BMA

28 Aug 2025

Lotus to cut 550 jobs to secure sustainable...

28 Aug 2025

Personnel Today Awards 2025 shortlist: Workplace culture (larger...

28 Aug 2025

City law firm freezes junior lawyers’ pay to...

28 Aug 2025

FCA issues clarity on workplace savings schemes to...

27 Aug 2025

MoD worker loses harassment claim over lack of...

27 Aug 2025

Acas to explore use of AI as half...

27 Aug 2025

TUC calls for ‘step change’ as half worry...

27 Aug 2025

  • Work smart – stay well: Avoid unnecessary pain with centred ergonomics SPONSORED | If you often notice...Read more
  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise