Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Employment lawCase law

Schultz-Hoff v Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund,European Court of Justice

by Personnel Today 15 Jul 2008
by Personnel Today 15 Jul 2008

Last month we looked at the Advocate General’s opinion in Stringer and others v Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs. In that case the Advocate General’s opinion was that employees continue to accrue paid annual leave under the Working Time Directive (WTD) during sickness absence and are entitled to a payment in lieu on termination of employment.

The Advocate General was also asked for an opinion in the Schultz-Hoff case, in which the employee was classified under German law as severely disabled. The employee was signed off on continuous sick leave from 8 September 2004. By a letter dated 13 May 2005 the employee requested to take his annual leave for 2004, from 1 June 2005. The employer refused on the ground that it first needed to be satisfied that the employee was able to work. In September 2005, the employee was granted an invalidity pension retroactively from 1 March 2005 and the employment relationship between the parties ended at the end of that September.

The employee brought a claim for an allowance in lieu for leave for 2004 and 2005. The claim was dismissed and the employee appealed. The appeal court asked the ECJ for a preliminary ruling.

The Advocate General’s opinion is that, under the WTD, leave not taken by a worker because of illness during the leave year must be granted at a later date. Further, at the end of the employment relationship, workers have a right to an allowance in lieu of leave. Both of these rights apply where the employee has been absent during the entire leave year due to illness.

Key points

  • The Advocate General’s opinion is that where an employee is unable to take annual paid leave under the WTD it must be granted at a later date. On termination of employment the employee is entitled to an allowance in lieu of accrued holiday.
  • These rights are not extinguished if the employee has been absent for the whole of the leave year.
  • This is not a legally binding decision, so we will have to wait for the decision of the ECJ.

What you should do

  • Review your policies. You can limit the amount of leave carried forward when an employee is sick or paid on termination in excess of the entitle­ment under the WTD.

Personnel Today
Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Northern Rock appoints Richard Smelt as new group HR director
next post
BBC defends HR chief Stephen Kelly’s £33,000 bonus

You may also like

AI in employment: the pitfalls and laws on...

21 Sep 2023

CIPD publishes manifesto for good work

20 Sep 2023

Right to predictable working hours receives Royal Assent

19 Sep 2023

Personnel Today Awards 2023 shortlist: Employment Law Firm...

7 Sep 2023

AI taskforce launched to address gaps in law

4 Sep 2023

Strikes Act consultation aims to establish minimum service...

25 Aug 2023

25 years of employment tribunals – a system...

25 Aug 2023

Bank holidays: six things employers need to know

25 Aug 2023

Flexible working legislation: what will the new rules...

16 Aug 2023

Strikes: Government will not appeal agency workers ruling

27 Jul 2023

  • Discover the value of CIPD accreditation PROMOTED | See how the CIPD can increase your earning potential...Read more
  • What does it mean to be an HR professional in 2024? (survey) PROMOTED | The world of HR is changing rapidly...Read more
  • The Contractor Management Mastery Pack: Everything you need to manage and pay global contractors PROMOTED | Answers to cross-border...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2023

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2023 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+