Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Vexatious claimsEmployment lawData protectionEmployment tribunals

Serial litigants website ‘condemned’ by MPs

by Louisa Peacock 25 Jan 2010
by Louisa Peacock 25 Jan 2010

Nearly 50 MPs have “condemned” a website launched by an employment lawyer to name and shame serial litigants.


Gordon Turner, co-founder of Partners Employment Lawyers, is coming under increasing fire from politicians after he exposed 30 serial tribunal claimants, with one man alone believed to have been involved in 150 allegations of discrimination.


The service, launched last year, offers employers facing claims a background search on claimants at a cost of £99.


In one case, a firm discovered a man had put through 35 cases under his name and had not turned up for 80% of them.


Vexatious claims often arose from the use of phrases in recruitment adverts, such as ‘recent graduate’ or ‘school leaver’, Turner has said.


But MPs are growing increasingly wary of the site, claiming it could be used to unfairly reject job applicants who have been involved in genuine tribunal cases.


An early day motion called ‘Victimisation in the Workplace’ and led by Labour MP David Anderson, posted on the UK Parliament site, said: “This House… condemns the launch of a website by Gordon Turner of Partners Employment Lawyers and Damian McCarthy from Cloisters Chambers which allows employers to find out if a person has taken an employer to tribunal in the past [and] believes that such a website could be used to screen unfairly applicants who have legitimately taken their employer to tribunal in the past, which runs contrary to the government’s progress on dealing with the victimisation of trade union members.”


The motion, yet to be debated in parliament, also expresses concern that the serial litigant website would be in breach of data protection laws.


Under the Data Protection Act, Turner is not allowed to maintain a database of serial litigants, but the website is understood to search information about previous claims and claimants using documents that are already in the public domain.


Turner told Personnel Today: “It is a shame that some members of parliament have misunderstood what we are trying to do, and that those supporting the early day motion hadn’t contacted us to clarify this.


Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

“All we do is make searching the public register easier and more cost effective. Politicians need to appreciate just how undermining of our tribunals service it is to allow serial claimants to cause so much trouble unchecked.”


Last year, HR chiefs warned the tribunal process was fundamentally flawed and needed a complete overhaul to prevent frivolous claims that have no chance of winning from blocking up the system.

Louisa Peacock

previous post
Redundancy: genuine or just ‘window dressing’?
next post
Is the public sector picking up private sector habits?

You may also like

Company director wins £15k after being told to...

4 Jul 2025

How can HR prepare for changes to the...

3 Jul 2025

Government publishes ‘roadmap’ for Employment Rights Bill

2 Jul 2025

Employers’ duty of care: keeping workers safe in...

27 Jun 2025

When will the Employment Rights Bill become law?

26 Jun 2025

HR manager with ‘messy’ work loses discrimination case

25 Jun 2025

Man who used company credit card for himself...

23 Jun 2025

Seven ways to prepare now for the Employment...

20 Jun 2025

AI company did not racially discriminate against Chinese...

20 Jun 2025

Barts nurse told to remove watermelon image claims...

19 Jun 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+