Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Case lawRace discriminationModern slavery

Supreme Court: give tribunals power to award compensation for modern slavery

by Stephen Simpson 22 Jun 2016
by Stephen Simpson 22 Jun 2016 Alex Segre/REX/Shutterstock.
Alex Segre/REX/Shutterstock.

Remedies under the Modern Slavery Act should be extended to allow employment tribunals to award compensation to the victims of slavery, a Supreme Court judge has said in Taiwo v Olaigbe and another; Onu v Akwiwu and another.

Two Nigerian women, Ms Taiwo and Ms Onu, came to the UK on a migrant domestic worker visa to work for couples living in the UK.

Foreign workers on this type of visa are heavily reliant on their current employer, as they have limited leave to remain in the UK and they have to seek approval from the authorities to change employer.

Task: Prepare a modern slavery and human trafficking statement

Example modern slavery and human trafficking statement

What duties do employers have under the “transparency in supply chains” provisions of the Modern Slavery Act 2015?

The two women brought employment tribunal claims for race discrimination over their treatment by the couples.

Ms Taiwo claimed that her passport was taken from her and she was expected to be “on duty” during most of her waking hours.

She said that she was not given enough to eat, and was mocked, slapped and spat on.

Ms Onu also claimed that her passport was taken from her on her arrival in the UK.

She said that she was required to work 84 hours per week and was told that she would be arrested and imprisoned if she tried to run away.

Both women eventually managed to escape their situations, and brought employment tribunal cases, including claims for race discrimination.

Their race discrimination claims were unsuccessful in the lower courts, on the basis that their former employers had mistreated them because of their vulnerable immigration status, rather than their Nigerian nationality.

When their cases reached the Supreme Court, it was accepted that they were treated “disgracefully”.

But the five Supreme Court judges decided unanimously to dismiss the race discrimination cases because “immigration status” by itself is not a protected characteristic under the Equality Act 2010.

Lady Hale, who delivered the judgment, highlighted that there is no remedy for all the “grievous harms” that the two women suffered.

Lady Hale suggested that Parliament could consider extending the remedies available under the Modern Slavery Act 2015 to recompense slavery victims for the ill treatment meted out to them.

The Modern Slavery Act 2015 enables a court to require that a person convicted of a slavery or trafficking offence to provide reparation to the victim. This is designed to recompense the slavery victim for “exploitation and degradation” suffered.

However, there is currently no power for employment tribunals to order the perpetrators of slavery or human trafficking, which sometimes arises in race discrimination claims, to pay compensation to the victim.

In Tirkey v Chandok and another, an employment tribunal case similar to the claims brought by the two women in this case, the claimant was awarded £82,763 for race discrimination, as well as £183,774 for non-payment of wages.

However, the claimant in that case was able to claim race discrimination because she argued that she was discriminated against because of her Indian caste.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

The Employment Appeal Tribunal has accepted that caste discrimination is covered under the race provisions in the Equality Act 2010.

Read more details of the case and its implications for employers…

Stephen Simpson

Stephen Simpson is Principal HR Strategy and Practice Editor at Brightmine. His areas of responsibility include the policies and documents and law reports. After obtaining a law degree and training to be a solicitor, he moved into publishing, initially with Butterworths. He joined Brightmine in its early days in 2001.

previous post
Employee engagement in a negative culture: how to break down barriers
next post
Seven signs to test for wellbeing readiness

1 comment

Employment law stories in the news – 20.06.2016 to 26.06.2016 | Redmans Solicitors 27 Jun 2016 - 8:05 am

[…] Supreme Court: give tribunals power to award compensation for modern slavery – Remedies under the Modern Slavery Act should be extended to allow employment tribunals to award compensation to the victims of slavery, a Supreme Court judge has said in Taiwo v Olaigbe and another; Onu v Akwiwu and another (Personnel Today) […]

Comments are closed.

You may also like

Consultation launched after Supreme Court ‘sex’ ruling

20 May 2025

Black security manager awarded £360k after decade of...

20 May 2025

EHRC bows to pressure and extends gender consultation

15 May 2025

Contract cleaner loses EAT race discrimination appeal

14 May 2025

Lincolnshire doctor awarded £250k in race discrimination case

2 May 2025

‘Unacceptable to question integrity’ of Supreme Court judgment

2 May 2025

Trans ex-judge to appeal Supreme Court biological sex...

29 Apr 2025

EHRC: Interim update on single-sex spaces draws criticism

28 Apr 2025

Trump ‘restores’ meritocracy by eroding discrimination protections

25 Apr 2025

Opposition to Supreme Court sex ruling is ‘wishful...

22 Apr 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+