Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS)Employment tribunals

Tribunal claimants less likely to proceed thanks to fees, survey finds

by Jo Faragher 11 Jun 2014
by Jo Faragher 11 Jun 2014

A Government-commissioned survey of the employment tribunal system has found that around half of claimants would reconsider proceeding with their claim if forced to pay a fee.

The 2013 Survey of Employment Tribunal Application (SETA), the first since 2008, interviewed around 2,000 employers and 2,000 employees on what they were seeking from the tribunal and the outcomes of their cases.

Although the claims covered in the SETA survey were not subject to the new fees regime, which requires claimants to pay up to £250 to make an application to the tribunal courts and a further fee once the claim has been listed, participants were asked whether having to pay a fee would influence their decision to go ahead with a claim.

Just under half (49%) of respondents said this would have influenced their decision, with younger claimants between the ages of 20 and 34 more likely to reconsider. Claimants in lower paid jobs, or with temporary contracts, were also more likely to say a fee would influence how they proceeded, compared to those with higher salaries or a permanent role.

When asked how they would have met the £250 cost, most respondents said they would have paid it out of their own personal income, while one in six would have borrowed it from friends or family.

SETAs findings are borne out by quarterly statistics from the Tribunals Service, which found that – in the period from October to December 2013 – there were 79% fewer tribunal claims received than in the same period in 2012.

In total, an offer of settlement was made in 68% of cases, and this resulted in settlement in four-fifths of those cases. In most cases, it was the employer who made the first offer of settlement.

The other key findings of SETA were:

  • 17% of all claims went to a full tribunal hearing.
  • 72% of claims were brought against private sector employers.
  • 92% of those who brought claims in 2013 were no longer working with the employer.
  • The proportion of cases where a formal meeting took place prior to a claim being submitted rose slightly from 2007, from 33% to 39%, despite the repeal of statutory dispute regulations during that period.
  • The majority of claimants (59%) had personal contact with someone from ACAS during the claim process.
  • Claims made in respect of wages disputes were more likely to be settled than those in respect of redundancy.
Jo Faragher
Jo Faragher

Jo Faragher has been an employment and business journalist for 20 years. She regularly contributes to Personnel Today and writes features for a number of national business and membership magazines. She won the Willis Towers Watson HR journalist of the year award in 2015 and has been highly commended twice.

previous post
Flexible working requests on-demand webinar
next post
Flexible working requests for all (webinar)

You may also like

Christian doctor loses transgender pronoun case, but beliefs...

29 Jun 2022

Christian awarded £22k following dismissal over religious necklace

24 Jun 2022

Long Covid: what tribunal’s disability ruling means for...

23 Jun 2022

Bolt drivers strike as union launches workers’ rights...

15 Jun 2022

Whistleblowing nurse awarded £462k for unfair dismissal

15 Jun 2022

Corporate reporting and audit regime will reduce risk...

31 May 2022

Frewer v Google: How it’s getting harder to...

30 May 2022

Parliament launches UK labour market inquiry

27 May 2022

Aspers casino cashier excluded by colleagues wins £75k...

23 May 2022

BNP Paribas banker accused of ’emotional terrorism’ wins...

19 May 2022
  • NSPCC revamps its learning strategy with child wellbeing at its heart PROMOTED | The NSPCC’s mission is to prevent abuse and neglect...Read more
  • Diversity versus inclusion: Why the difference matters PROMOTED | It’s possible for an environment to be diverse, but not inclusive...Read more
  • Five steps for organisations across the globe to become more skills-driven PROMOTED | The shift in the world of work has been felt across the globe...Read more
  • The future of workforce development PROMOTED | Northumbria University and partners share insight...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+