Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Latest News

TUC accuses British Government of misrepresenting work-time facts

by Personnel Today 19 May 2004
by Personnel Today 19 May 2004

Discussing
the future of the UK’s opt-out to the European Working Time Directive with the
European Commission, the TUC claims the UK Government has "has seriously
misrepresented the situation" in this country.

The
opt-out allows individuals to sign away their right to work no more than 48
hours a week on average.

In
a report and letter sent to the commission today, the TUC analyses the UK
Government submission and finds that it:

•
denies that long-hours working has an effect on health and safety despite British
Government research that shows that there are ‘clear grounds for concern about
the adverse effects of long-hours working and the frequency of health and
safety incidents

•
only refers to the incidence of accidents at work when the European Court of Justice
has established in the case, that the UK Conservative Government lost in 1996,
that health and safety should include issues such as heart attacks, stress and
occupational diseases

•
argues that Ireland and Denmark have good records on job creation because they
have flexible labour markets, even though both countries have implemented
working-time rules in full

•
claims the UK Government is already tackling the long-hours culture, even
though the reduction in longs hours working has been so slow that it will take
the UK another 40 years to reach the EU average

•
claims there is high awareness and easy enforcement of working-time rights,
even though only one in three workers know about the 48-hour limit.

•
claims that two-thirds of long-hours workers would face a pay cut if a 48-hour
average week was introduced. The TUC said the true figure is two-fifths and
ignores the likelihood that employers will secure sufficient productivity gains
to reduce working time with no loss of pay

•
aims to weaken the employee voice by automatically working out the average
working time over 52 weeks (a year) rather than the current 17 weeks (which, at
present, can only  be extended to a year
though a union or workforce agreement).  

TUC
general secretary Brendan Barber said: "The UK Government’s evidence is
riddled with errors, inconsistencies and sloppy argument. If this is the best
it can do, it shows the strength of the case for ending the opt-out.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

"Our
only worry is that the commission may fail to understand that this is little
more than a cut-and-paste job from employer lobbying.

By Quentin Reade

TUC
Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Webley v Department for Work and Pensions, EAT/0033/04 unreported
next post
US service industry gripped by outsourcing fever

You may also like

MPs reject Lords’ amendments to Employment Rights Bill

16 Sep 2025

Failure to prevent fraud: Only 29% training staff...

16 Sep 2025

Scottish government funds furlough for bus manufacturer

16 Sep 2025

Which employers offer equal parental leave?

16 Sep 2025

Google to create 8,250 AI jobs as part...

16 Sep 2025

‘The spotlight on AI skills risks creating an...

16 Sep 2025

Jobs market continuing to stagnate, says official data

16 Sep 2025

Call for a national OH service to tackle...

16 Sep 2025

Right to request flexible working has had limited...

16 Sep 2025

Staff prioritise work-life balance and boundaries – research

16 Sep 2025

  • Workplace health benefits need to be simplified SPONSORED | Long-term sickness...Read more
  • Work smart – stay well: Avoid unnecessary pain with centred ergonomics SPONSORED | If you often notice...Read more
  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits Live
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise