Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Employment tribunals

Unison loses third bid to overturn tribunal fees

by Jo Faragher 26 Aug 2015
by Jo Faragher 26 Aug 2015 Unison will take its fight to the Supreme Court. Photo: Jonathan Hordle/Rex Shutterstock
Unison will take its fight to the Supreme Court. Photo: Jonathan Hordle/Rex Shutterstock

Unison has lost a further challenge in its bid to overturn the introduction of tribunal fees.

The Court of Appeal dismissed the union’s third appeal for a judicial review of the fees regime, introduced in July 2013, claiming there was insufficient evidence of claimants’ ability to afford the fees to support this.

Tribunal fees resources

Check the rules on fees to bring a tribunal claim

Employment tribunal and Employment Appeal Tribunal fees

Employment tribunal fees: are they blocking access to the tribunal system?

Unison has repeatedly argued that a sharp decline in the number of cases being brought to tribunal is due to claimants now having to pay anything up to £1,200, depending on the type of claim brought.

But at today’s hearing, Lord Justice Underhill said that, although he was “troubled” by the drop in cases, “the case based on the overall decline in claims cannot succeed by itself”.

He added: “It needs to be accompanied by evidence of the actual affordability of fees in the financial circumstances of (typical) individuals.

“Only evidence of this character will enable the Court to reach a reliable conclusion that that the fees payable under the Order will indeed be realistically unaffordable in some cases.”

In February 2014, the trade union’s first challenge to the fees system was unsuccessful, with the High Court stressing that it was too early at that point to judge the effectiveness and impact of fees.

In December 2014, a second challenge came before the High Court, with Unison allowed to introduce new statistical information suggesting that certain vulnerable groups, such as single mothers, would be particularly disadvantaged by employment tribunal fees.

At its last hearing in June, Unison argued that a dramatic drop in claims (of 79% in the first year, according to the TUC) had “no obvious explanation, other than the introduction of fees”.

At the latest hearing, the Court pointed out that, because fee waivers are available in “exceptional circumstances”, then it could not be said that the fee system in general was unaffordable.

Unison had argued in previous appeals that the fees system had a disproportionately adverse impact on women, or those with protected characteristics. However, these concerns were also dismissed by the Court.

Lord Justice Underhill observed that the Government has recently committed to a review of the employment tribunal system, which is expected to be completed later this year.

Unison will now seek permission to appeal its case to the Supreme Court.

General Secretary Dave Prentis said: “Today’s decision is a huge disappointment and a major setback for people at work. Many unscrupulous employers will be rubbing their hands together in glee at the news.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

“There is stark evidence that workers are being priced out of justice and it is women, the disabled and the low-paid who are being disproportionately punished.

“Our fight for fairness at work and access to justice for all will continue until these unfair and punitive fees are scrapped.”

Jo Faragher

Jo Faragher has been an employment and business journalist for 20 years. She regularly contributes to Personnel Today and writes features for a number of national business and membership magazines. Jo is also the author of 'Good Work, Great Technology', published in 2022 by Clink Street Publishing, charting the relationship between effective workplace technology and productive and happy employees. She won the Willis Towers Watson HR journalist of the year award in 2015 and has been highly commended twice.

previous post
How software can help to streamline global relocation
next post
How to manage eating disorders at work

You may also like

Café worker awarded £22k after being too cold...

26 Aug 2025

Exec hauled over coals for sleeping in sauna...

22 Aug 2025

Lidl enters agreement with EHRC to prevent sexual...

22 Aug 2025

Nature charity unfairly dismisses employee in ‘woeful’ process

22 Aug 2025

Security manager at BBC unfairly dismissed after ‘misusing’...

21 Aug 2025

Reasonable adjustment failures for epilepsy lead to £445k...

21 Aug 2025

‘Noisy and boisterous’ younger colleagues not age-related harassment

20 Aug 2025

‘Zero tolerance’ on staff discount abuse leads to...

19 Aug 2025

Security officer who showed ‘racist’ video wins £44k...

18 Aug 2025

Police Scotland constable who can’t work in cold...

15 Aug 2025

  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise