Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Who picks up the tab for introducing laws?

by Personnel Today 18 Dec 2001
by Personnel Today 18 Dec 2001

If Dickens’ A Christmas Carol was updated surely Ebenezer Scrooge, the
hard-nosed local employer, would have signed up to a progressive work-focused
think-tank following his ghostly visitations. Hard working employee Bob
Cratchit – a newly empowered stakeholder – would have been given so much reward
and time sovereignty that Tiny Tim would have grown up to be a Chippendale.

But even the enlightened Scrooge would have rejected the idea that improved
working conditions should be enforced by law. He prefers that employers should
voluntarily come to share his change of heart.

It is a typical view even for the enlightened. Employers constantly complain
that offering greater legal rights to workers is harmful to jobs. Recent
legislation has cost UK employers about £6bn each year.

However, while obviously a big number, the implicit assertion that this is
necessarily bad news for job creation is misleading. Half the amount is due to
paying the National Minimum Wage – which at the modest rate set has had no
discernible effect on employment levels. The remainder stems from new rights
that include working time, part-time work and parental leave.

But as with any tax one must ask the key question – who pays? And in this
case the answer is not employers, but workers. Over time wages adjust downwards
to compensate for higher regulation costs. In other words, workers themselves
pay for these improved employment rights.

Enshrining better working conditions in law could therefore be viewed as a
form of social compact whereby employers are required to act as intermediaries
between the state and civil society to enhance the common good. Employers
should be eager to adopt this role since, as research from CIPD and elsewhere
shows, better work is also more profitable work.

So why do employers complain? The trouble, of course, is that regulation
tends to be introduced with such speed, or in such a bureaucratic fashion, that
employers struggle to cope. A sudden tsunami of red tape can kill small
employers faced with cash flow prob- lems, while the cost hike involved can
lead to short-run job losses throughout the economy. And excessive form filling
detracts from everyday business activities.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

These are clearly legitimate grounds for concern. Yet while it is
justifiable to criticise how it is introduced, there is a tendency for some
employers to take their opposition to red tape too far. Workers have a right to
expect decent employment conditions and sensibly implemented regulation can
help guarantee these. Let’s hope UK employers recognise this in 2002, and then
staff everywhere will agree with Tiny Tim when he declared, "God bless
’em, every one."

By John Philpott, Chief economist, CIPD

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
FTSE exec salary levels could create boardroom pay explosion
next post
DTI unveils plans for raft of equality laws

You may also like

Dallas Cowboy Cheerleaders receive 400% pay rise

4 Jul 2025

FCA to extend misconduct rules beyond banks

2 Jul 2025

‘Decisive action’ needed to boost workers’ pensions

2 Jul 2025

Business leaders’ drop in confidence impacts headcount

2 Jul 2025

Why we need to rethink soft skills in...

1 Jul 2025

Five misconceptions about hiring refugees

20 Jun 2025

Forward features list 2025 – submitting content to...

23 Nov 2024

Features list 2021 – submitting content to Personnel...

1 Sep 2020

Large firms have no plans to bring all...

26 Aug 2020

A typical work-from-home lunch: crisps

24 Aug 2020

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+