Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Will new stress guidance help ease the burden on employers?

by Personnel Today 26 Feb 2002
by Personnel Today 26 Feb 2002

New guidelines will force staff to raise issues about stress with their
employer earlier.  By Ross Wigham

New guidelines issued by the Court of Appeal look set to make it much harder
for employees to bring successful compensation claims for work-related stress.

Justices issued the guidelines earlier this month when they overturned
decisions by county courts to award £200,000 in stress-related compensation to
three workers.

The guidance states that if employers offer staff a confidential counselling
service with access to treatment it is unlikely they will be found in breach of
their duty of care.

Employees must also raise any concerns they have over stress at work with
their employer and give them an opportunity to address the issue before taking
legal action, if they are to have any chance of winning compensation.

The Court of Appeal decision could reverse the huge increase in
stress-related injury claims. Research by the TUC reveals a 12-fold increase in
stress claims last year, with 6,428 new cases reported, compared with just 516
for the previous 12 months.

Christopher Mordue, a partner with law firm Pinsent Curtis Biddle, believes
the decision will make it very hard for staff to make a work-related stress
claim unless they have first brought their problems to the attention of their
employer.

"Employers who have in place policies and procedures that deal with
stress will be in a very strong position to defend compensation claims,"
he said.

The Association of Healthcare Human Resource Management welcomed the new
guidelines. Tracy Myhill, the association’s president, thinks the ruling will
ensure staff highlight stress as soon as it becomes a problem so it can be
addressed before claims reach the courts.

She said: "It seems the ruling will make it easier for the employer.
Most NHS employers have good occupational health departments anyway and a big
part of that is confidential counselling or advice.

"Employees must tell their bosses if workplace stress is affecting
them, otherwise, how else will they know? It’s difficult for a huge
organisation like the NHS to keep tabs on worker stress levels, so the onus is
on staff to point it out. Overall, I don’t think it will change what we do that
much."

Socpo president Keith Handley is optimistic the stress guidelines will
encourage local government employers to support staff through measures such as
confidential counselling.

"For some time we have been advocating that local authorities look
after employees and I’d like to see all staff having access to counselling via
the occupational health function," he said.

However, not all employment law experts think the guidelines will have a
huge impact on the way stress claims are dealt with.

In fact, the CIPD is not convinced the Court of Appeal decision will prove
to be a watershed.

Diane Sinclair, CIPD employee relations adviser, warned organisations not to
be complacent and advised them to carry out risk assessments. "It’s a
useful clarification of their position and a common-sense decision, but these
barriers were largely in place anyway," she said.

"The key development is the counselling aspect, but even this should be
approached with caution and not be the sole feature of a stress policy. Firms
should be conducting risk assessments."

Law firm Eversheds also warned employers that the new guidelines will not
apply on all occasions, for example in discrimination cases.

Elaine Aarons, a partner at the firm, said it is not always necessary to
show stress-related illness was reasonably foreseeable.

She explained: "Despite the ruling, employers can still be found liable
for stress regardless of signs that the employee may be having difficulties.

"Victims of discrimination and harassment often suffer stress to such
an extent that it amounts to a psychiatric illness. In these cases, the
employment tribunal has the power to award damages.

"Under discrimination legislation it is not necessary to show that the
illness or injury was reasonably foreseeable."

UMIST’s Professor Cary Cooper, an expert on stress, thinks the ruling may
even lead to more stress claims as it will encourage more staff to raise the
issue with their employer at an earlier stage.

"All this does is clarify what we already know. I don’t think this will
mean fewer stress claims – if anything, it could mean even more.

"Unions will be urging staff to tell their employer if they can’t cope
so something can be done about it," he said.

www.hse.gov.uk

www.tuc.org.uk

www.porch.ccta.gov.uk/courtser/judgements.nsf

Stress cases that hit the headlines

John Walker

The Northumberland senior social worker made history by winning
the first stress settlement in April 1996. He was awarded £175,000

Beverley Lancaster

Employed by Birmingham City Council, Lancaster switched to a
housing officer role without training. She won £67,000 in July 1999 and
received the first acknowledgement by an employer that it was liable for stress

Randy Ingram

A gypsy site warden for Worcestershire Council, Ingram suffered
stress after being shot at and assaulted. He won £203,000 in January 2000

Roderick McLeod

McLeod said he developed psychiatric illness as a result of his
bullying boss at Test Valley Borough Council. He won a £200,000 pay-out in
January 2000

Guidance
notes

– Employers can usually assume that
employees can withstand the pressures of the job unless they know of a
particular problem

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

– If an employer offers a counselling
service with access to treatment, it will rarely be held in breach of their
duty of care

– Employees need to raise concerns
regarding stress with their employers and give the employer a chance to do
something about it

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Big bank gets bigger despite job cuts
next post
UK metrics will win respect in the boardroom

You may also like

Forward features list 2025 – submitting content to...

23 Nov 2024

Features list 2021 – submitting content to Personnel...

1 Sep 2020

Large firms have no plans to bring all...

26 Aug 2020

A typical work-from-home lunch: crisps

24 Aug 2020

Occupational health on the coronavirus frontline – ‘I...

21 Aug 2020

Occupational Health & Wellbeing research round-up: August 2020

7 Aug 2020

Acas: Redundancy related enquiries surge 160%

5 Aug 2020

Coronavirus: lockdown ‘phase two’ may bring added headaches...

17 Jul 2020

Unemployment to top 4 million as workers come...

15 Jul 2020

Over 1,000 UK redundancies expected at G4S Cash...

14 Jul 2020

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+