Business leaders believe annual staff cull would boost organisational performance

An overwhelming majority of UK senior executives believe being able to sack a fixed number of staff every year would improve their organisation’s performance.

More than three-quarters of the 562 business leaders surveyed by management consultancy Hudson said having an annual staff cull would boost financial performance and productivity.

One in six executives said their company could target up to 20% of its workforce for dismissal per year without damaging productivity and morale. More than four in ten agreed that dismissing up to 5% of staff was positively healthy.

Steve Ballmer, chief executive of Microsoft, last year urged British businesses to follow his example and sack as many underperforming staff as possible each year.

Ensuring strong team members are not carrying the weaker ones was cited as the main advantage (60%) of deliberately releasing average or below-average performers.

But almost one in four bosses admitted that the current employment climate, where available talent is scarce, means they would rather retain average or even below-average performers.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

Email(Required)

OptOut

From time to time, we will send you emails about selected products, events and services from Personnel Today and OHW+ - but you can choose to opt-out at any time. If you do not wish to receive these emails, please tick this box.

Phone

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Δ

John Rose, chief executive of Hudson UK, said: “Sometimes, the best career direction for an employee is out of the company.”