Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Latest NewsPay & benefitsPensions

State pension age hike should be faster and higher says PricewaterhouseCoopers report

by Mike Berry 25 Feb 2010
by Mike Berry 25 Feb 2010

The state pension age (SPA) should be raised faster and further than currently planned and the default retirement age (DRA) should be scrapped, according to a new report.


The Working longer, living better: A fiscal and social imperative report by professional services firm PricerwaterhouseCoopers, said the changes were needed to fund higher state pensions, reduce public debt and reflect the population trend of longer, healthier lives.


While the government has already legislated for the SPA to rise to 66 by 2026, 67 by 2036 and 68 by 2046, the report questions whether this goes far enough, particularly given the sharp rise in UK public debt.


A phased increase in the SPA to 70 by 2046 would have an estimated net fiscal benefit relative to current plans of around 0.6% of GDP in 2046, or around £9bn at 2010-11 GDP values, the report estimates. A higher SPA would help to fund a more generous future state pension without adding further to the burden of public debt and taxation on younger generations of workers.


The Conservatives have already said they will raise the pension age to 66 for men by 2016 if they come to power after the next election.


The report also identifies a wider programme of change that requires government, employers and employees to embrace new approaches to the delivery of health, social care and adult skills. This would include scrapping the default retirement age (DRA) for employees, although the report says this change would need to be announced far enough in advance to allow employers to plan effectively.


A decision on the future of the DRA is expected in the summer after a government review.


Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

John Hawksworth, head of macroeconomics at PwC and co-author of the report, said: “Either taxes will have to rise or other policies need to adjust to deal with the higher costs of state pensions, health and long-term care, as well as the large debt hangover from the global financial crisis.


“A phased increase in the state pension age is part of the solution and the government already has plans to increase this to 68 by 2046, but we believe it needs to go further and faster.”

Mike Berry

previous post
Unpaid leave – the fight for survival: can employees afford to do it?
next post
Civil servants to strike over redundancy scheme changes

You may also like

Day one rights in the Employment Rights Bill...

28 Aug 2025

EHRC acts on policies flouting law on single-sex...

28 Aug 2025

Medical profession more ableist than wider society: BMA

28 Aug 2025

Lotus to cut 550 jobs to secure sustainable...

28 Aug 2025

Personnel Today Awards 2025 shortlist: Workplace culture (larger...

28 Aug 2025

City law firm freezes junior lawyers’ pay to...

28 Aug 2025

FCA issues clarity on workplace savings schemes to...

27 Aug 2025

MoD worker loses harassment claim over lack of...

27 Aug 2025

Acas to explore use of AI as half...

27 Aug 2025

TUC calls for ‘step change’ as half worry...

27 Aug 2025

  • Work smart – stay well: Avoid unnecessary pain with centred ergonomics SPONSORED | If you often notice...Read more
  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise