Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

CIPDDepartment for Business and Trade (DBT)Employment tribunalsPolitical elections

Employers split over impact of employment tribunal fees, says CIPD

by Jo Faragher 17 Mar 2015
by Jo Faragher 17 Mar 2015 Photo: Alex Segre/REX
Photo: Alex Segre/REX

Employers are split as to whether or not the introduction of employment tribunal fees has been a good thing, according to new research by the CIPD.

A thin majority (38%) of employers feel that the current system should be left as it is, despite the fact that there has been a 70% reduction in claims since employment tribunal fees were introduced in 2013.

Employment tribunal resources

Employment tribunals: XpertHR Benchmarking data

Check the rules on fees to bring a tribunal claim

Form for making a claim to an employment tribunal

Tribunal procedures and penalties: the claim form ET1

Slightly fewer organisations (36%) believe that fees should either be significantly reduced or abolished altogether, while just over a quarter are undecided about the impact of fees, the survey of 1,000 employers revealed.

Responding to the CIPD’s findings, business secretary Vince Cable has now put in place a review of the fees regime.

He said: “It is vital that the employment tribunal system strikes the right balance between employee and employer protection. The fact that employers are so split over whether the introduction of tribunal fees has been a good or bad thing further reinforces the need for a review, despite opposition in some quarters.”

Since last July, workers wishing to bring a claim to tribunal are charged an “issue fee” of up to £250 when a claim is lodged, and a “hearing fee” that is payable before the case is heard, which can be up to £950.

Last year, Unison lost its second High Court bid to overturn the new regime, after its assessment of the drop in claims was deemed “speculative” by the judge. It has now appealed to the Supreme Court, but judges are yet to decide if a third attempt to overturn the regime can go ahead.

It’s unlikely that the current fees regime will survive the general election in May by many months as all three major political parties have indicated an intention to review it.” – Mike Emmott, CIPD

Shadow business secretary Chuka Umunna has also pledged that Labour will conduct a thorough review of the fees regime if it gets into power in May.

Mike Emmott, the CIPD’s employee relations adviser, said: “It’s unlikely that the current fees regime will survive the general election in May by many months as all three major political parties have indicated an intention to review it.”

He added: “Assuming that fees survive in some shape or form, it will be important to get the balance right between having a fee structure that is simple to understand and one that is proportionate to the type of claim being made.”

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

The CIPD’s research also found that employers are increasingly finding alternative ways to deal with conflict in order to avoid tribunal claims; around half are training managers to handle “difficult conversations”.

Just under a quarter of employers use internal mediation through a trained member of staff, while almost one in 10 use external mediators to help manage conflict, the CIPD found.

Jo Faragher

Jo Faragher has been an employment and business journalist for 20 years. She regularly contributes to Personnel Today and writes features for a number of national business and membership magazines. Jo is also the author of 'Good Work, Great Technology', published in 2022 by Clink Street Publishing, charting the relationship between effective workplace technology and productive and happy employees. She won the Willis Towers Watson HR journalist of the year award in 2015 and has been highly commended twice.

previous post
Two-thirds of fathers open to taking shared parental leave
next post
Prostate problems: how can employers help?

You may also like

Company director wins £15k after being told to...

4 Jul 2025

Movers and shakers in HR: Asda, BBC, FSB,...

26 Jun 2025

HR manager with ‘messy’ work loses discrimination case

25 Jun 2025

Skills receive £1.2bn boost in new industrial strategy

23 Jun 2025

Low-paid could receive ‘Britannia’ dividend under Reform’s non-dom...

23 Jun 2025

Man who used company credit card for himself...

23 Jun 2025

AI company did not racially discriminate against Chinese...

20 Jun 2025

Barts nurse told to remove watermelon image claims...

19 Jun 2025

WFH employee who falsified timesheets loses unfair dismissal...

16 Jun 2025

Sleeping security officer wins £20k for unfair dismissal

16 Jun 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+