Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Case lawLocal authoritiesDiscriminationEqual pay

Glasgow City Council claimants win equal pay case

by Stephen Simpson 1 Jun 2017
by Stephen Simpson 1 Jun 2017 George Square and town hall, Glasgow. Photo: RelaxImages/REX/Shutterstock.
George Square and town hall, Glasgow. Photo: RelaxImages/REX/Shutterstock.

Unions representing thousands of claimants in a long-running equal pay claim against Glasgow City Council have welcomed the latest victory in the Court of Session.

Public sector pay

Podcast: Gender pay gap reporting for the public sector

Public-sector pay 2016/2017: Government keeps the focus on pay restraint

Pay and the employment contract: local authority

The case, which was brought on behalf of around 6,000 claimants, involves pay protection introduced over a decade ago following a job evaluation scheme (JES).

The JES was introduced in response to a wave of equal pay awards.

In the case, which has now been decided in the Court of Session, the claimants argued that the pay protection scheme had the effect of discriminating against women by excluding them.

The claimants argued that the loss of bonuses for male-dominated groups following the JES resulted in those groups being given the benefit of pay protection (“red-circling”).

According to the claimants, as these bonuses favoured male groups, the way in which the pay protection scheme operated was fundamentally discriminatory against women.

In Glasgow City Council v Unison and others, the Court of Session upheld the earlier Employment Appeal Tribunal decision that the pay protection scheme was discriminatory against women.

Unison and the GMB, which is aiding thousands of claimants in the case, both welcomed the judgment.

Mike Kirby, Unison’s Scottish secretary, said: “The pay protection win is great news. The way Glasgow rates and pays workers has been the source of conflict and division for 10 years.

“These women have already waited long enough to receive the pay they have worked hard for and deserve. It’s time for Glasgow City Council to do the right thing and pay up on equal pay.”

Meanwhile, GMB Scotland secretary Gary Smith said: “After years of legal wrangling by Glasgow City Council, this judgment paves the way for thousands of low-paid women to claim justice.

Tasks: job evaluation

Decide on a job evaluation scheme

Carry out a job evaluation exercise

Implement the results of a job evaluation exercise

“Times have been tough for these women who have had to endure this discrimination against a decade of real-terms wage cuts across Scottish local government as a result of stifling austerity.

“The vast majority of them are our carers, caterers and cleaners, employed on the bottom rungs of the local government pay.”

The unions called on Glasgow City Council to open a dialogue to decide on the best forward to ensure that the claimants would be paid.

A Glasgow City Council spokesman said: “The council implemented a new pay and benefits structure, designed to ensure equal pay more than 10 years ago. The matter before the court on this occasion related to the initial implementation of that scheme – and, more specifically, the decision to offer a three-year period of payment protection as a ‘soft landing’ for members of the workforce facing a drop in earnings.”

Councillor Susan Aitken, leader of Glasgow City Council, said: “This is a complex legal ruling. However it is now clear that the award of pay protection was done in a way which discriminated against some of our female workers at that time.

“The right thing to do now is for the council to have open discussions with those workers and their representatives about how we give effect to this ruling. I hope there will be goodwill on both sides during those discussions.”

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

The unions also await a second Court of Session judgment challenging the Glasgow City Council pay system.

In the second dispute, they argue that the council’s approach to job evaluation, using scales for core pay and non-core pay, makes it impossible to assess whether or not workers are being paid equal pay for equal work.

Stephen Simpson

Stephen Simpson is Principal HR Strategy and Practice Editor at Brightmine. His areas of responsibility include the policies and documents and law reports. After obtaining a law degree and training to be a solicitor, he moved into publishing, initially with Butterworths. He joined Brightmine in its early days in 2001.

previous post
What do the new picketing laws mean in practice for employers?
next post
Evolution of an occupational health physiotherapy service

You may also like

£188k tribunal award for director sacked after cardiac...

10 Jul 2025

Living wage pushes up spring pay settlements

2 Jul 2025

Ethnicity and disability pay gaps: Ready to report?...

1 Jul 2025

Co-op equal pay claims move onto next stage

30 Jun 2025

Progressive DEI policy is a red line for...

27 Jun 2025

Graduate pay versus the living wage: an HR...

25 Jun 2025

HR manager with ‘messy’ work loses discrimination case

25 Jun 2025

School’s bid to appeal Kristie Higgs ruling refused...

11 Jun 2025

Healthdaq: Shaking up health and social care recruitment

11 Jun 2025

Court rejects Liberty’s legal challenge against EHRC consultation

9 Jun 2025

  • Empower and engage for the future: A revolution in talent development (webinar) WEBINAR | As organisations strive...Read more
  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+