Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Latest NewsEmployment tribunals

Recruitment drive for judges to tackle rise in employment cases

by Jo Faragher 18 Jun 2018
by Jo Faragher 18 Jun 2018 Andy Paradise/REX/Shutterstock
Andy Paradise/REX/Shutterstock

The Judicial Appointments Commission is to recruit 54 new judges in a bid to tackle a backlog of cases in the employment tribunal system.

Tribunal system

Employment tribunal fees system is unlawful, decides Supreme Court

Podcast: The abolition of tribunal fees

The tribunal system has been struggling to keep up with an increase in cases since fees were found to be unlawful by the Supreme Court in July 2017.

New cases brought by individuals almost doubled in the first full quarter of data since fees were abolished, increasing by 90% in the three months to December 2017, compared with the same quarter the year before. This level of claims was the highest it has been since the third quarter of 2013.

Selection for the new judges begins today and the closing date for applications is 2 July. The role of Salaried Judge of the Employment Tribunal attracts a salary of £108,171, with a further £2,000 for London-based judges.

Candidates need at least five years’ post-qualification experience as a solicitor or barrister in England or Wales; as a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives, as an advocate or solicitor in Scotland; or a member of the Bar of Northern Ireland or a solicitor of the Supreme Court of Northern Ireland.

Applicants are also expected to have “current or previous substantial experience” of employment law.

According to employment judge Brian Doyle, who is president of the employment tribunal, the courts have not recruited new employment judges for more than five years. Last year he warned of an impending recruitment crisis after several judges left the bench and were not replaced.

Tribunal user groups have shared concerns over growing caseloads and claimants waiting months for hearing dates. Average disposal times, according to the latest data from the Ministry of Justice, are 26 weeks for single cases, compared with a target of 20 weeks.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

When fees were introduced in 2013, there was a sharp drop in cases, so many judges were allowed to retire or able to sit in other courts. The new judges are expected to take up their positions in 2019.

“Since fees were abolished last July the number of employment tribunal cases has increased significantly but lack of resources has led to delays and postponements,” said Sarah Ozanne, an employment lawyer at CMS. “The recruitment of more judges to tackle this issue is welcome but additional administrative resource is also crucial to ensure cases are dealt with efficiently.”

Jo Faragher

Jo Faragher has been an employment and business journalist for 20 years. She regularly contributes to Personnel Today and writes features for a number of national business and membership magazines. Jo is also the author of 'Good Work, Great Technology', published in 2022 by Clink Street Publishing, charting the relationship between effective workplace technology and productive and happy employees. She won the Willis Towers Watson HR journalist of the year award in 2015 and has been highly commended twice.

previous post
1,500 jobs expected to be lost in Virgin Money takeover
next post
7 tips on people analytics HR can count on

3 comments

Ian McPherson 18 Jun 2018 - 8:20 pm

Why have you shown a photo of bewigged and gowned Judges – Employment Judges are not so dressed .

Ian McPherson

Secretary, Council of Employment Judges

Rob Moss 20 Jun 2018 - 10:13 am

Thanks Ian – thanks for the feedback.
We need to invest in some ET pictures! We’ve changed the picture now.
Rob Moss, editor

Manjula Bray 28 Jun 2018 - 10:09 pm

Lots of interest at my workshop/ info evening with Judge Doyle (et al) and a Judicial Appointments Commissioner (on the selection process held at Clifford Chance in Canary Wharf on Mon this week)…perhaps because the judiciary is recruiting 54 FTEs – possibly attracting more applicants with caring responsibilities. Nice to see…hopefully they’ll find the right caliber

Comments are closed.

You may also like

Company director wins £15k after being told to...

4 Jul 2025

HR manager with ‘messy’ work loses discrimination case

25 Jun 2025

Man who used company credit card for himself...

23 Jun 2025

AI company did not racially discriminate against Chinese...

20 Jun 2025

Barts nurse told to remove watermelon image claims...

19 Jun 2025

WFH employee who falsified timesheets loses unfair dismissal...

16 Jun 2025

Sleeping security officer wins £20k for unfair dismissal

16 Jun 2025

Menopause claims triple in two years, tribunal figures...

16 Jun 2025

The employer strikes back: the rise of ‘quiet...

13 Jun 2025

Former employees of Wilko gain £2m payout

13 Jun 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+