Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Latest NewsPublic sectorPay & benefitsPay settlementsSick pay

Ministry of Justice pay deal on rocks as unions reject ‘conditions’

by Adam McCulloch 21 Aug 2018
by Adam McCulloch 21 Aug 2018 Photo: Rex
Photo: Rex

Prospect union members yesterday joined their colleagues at the FDA union in rejecting a five-year pay deal that would have substantially increased wages because of changes to conditions attached to it.

Senior civil servants who are members of the FDA union had already voted against the Modernising the Employment Proposition (MEP) with 65% supporting its rejection. Prospect members voted by 71% to turn down the offer, while a third union and the one with the most MoJ members, the Public and Commercial Services Union (PCS), is still conducting its ballot (closing on 30 August).

Pay awards

Forecasts for pay awards in 2018

How HR can help in a tough financial climate

Forecasts for pay awards

MEP would have been worth up to 11% for some staff, consisting of 3% per year for the first three years, then 1% in each of the next two.

The MoJ conceded that the 9% pay rise in the first three years would benefit only just over half of staff but emphasised that 88% of staff would receive a higher increase in basic salary than under the current system of annual 1% pay rises.

In return, the MEP would have seen the working week increase from 35-37 hours to 38 hours and a move towards increased flexibility over finish times and Saturday and bank holiday working. Overtime pay would be converted to a flat single time rate. The overnight allowance would have fallen from £23 to £9 and mileage rates cut from 35p per mile to 25p per mile. The MoJ said that “no one will be forced to take on the extra hours if they would prefer to stay on their current hours and work pro-rata.”

The deal was considered self-financing by the Treasury because the changes in conditions, which also included a month being cut off sick-pay entitlements (from six months’ full pay to five) and the London allowance being replaced, would have paid for it.

Prospect’s negotiations officer Brian Harris said the union raised concerns over the changes in conditions throughout negotiations and that the changes proved “too severe for our members”.

PCS general secretary Mark Serwotka, whose union also recommends its members to reject the change, said the verdicts left the MEP proposals “dead in the water”.

The MoJ is among the largest government departments and its 77,000 employees work across more than 1,000 workplaces. It includes agencies such as HM Courts and Tribunals Service and HM Prison Services. About 3,600 Prospect members work for the department. PCS has the most members among unions represented at the MoJ with more than 10,000 employees.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

The MoJ was not prepared to comment on the two union votes before the result of the PCS ballot was known but stated: “The Modernising the Employment Proposition proposals will provide better pay, modernise a complex allowance system and bring the grading structure in line with the wider Civil Service. Eighty per cent of staff will receive a higher increase in basic salary than if we continued with 1% annual pay rises. The proposals will also help make the Ministry of Justice more attractive to potential recruits and improve staff retention.”

Minister showed ‘contempt’ in botched civil service pay consultation

Adam McCulloch

Adam McCulloch first worked for Personnel Today magazine in the early 1990s as a sub editor. He rejoined Personnel Today as a writer in 2017, covering all aspects of HR but with a special interest in diversity, social mobility and industrial relations. He has ventured beyond the HR realm to work as a freelance writer and production editor in sectors including travel (The Guardian), aviation (Flight International), agriculture (Farmers' Weekly), music (Jazzwise), theatre (The Stage) and social work (Community Care). He is also the author of KentWalksNearLondon. Adam first became interested in industrial relations after witnessing an exchange between Arthur Scargill and National Coal Board chairman Ian McGregor in 1984, while working as a temp in facilities at the NCB, carrying extra chairs into a conference room!

previous post
Offering yoga and meditation alone will not prevent stress
next post
New polls confirm desire for flexible working as 9 to 5 declines

1 comment

Steven Jones 21 Aug 2018 - 9:21 pm

Yes, they didn’t mention that by those moving from 37 to 38 hours would account for 2.6 % of that raise. So you would just be getting paid for your 38 hours with a juicy 0.4% pay increase in that first year on hours worked.

Comments are closed.

You may also like

Decision to sack man for Michael Jackson noises...

29 Aug 2025

P&O Ferries boss who steered 800 sackings steps...

29 Aug 2025

UK large companies’ succession planning is weak –...

29 Aug 2025

Gender bonus bias widens pay gap, says Brightmine

29 Aug 2025

Bankers learn of redundancy in email gaffe asking...

29 Aug 2025

Cabin crew manager with ‘flirty banter’ loses discrimination...

29 Aug 2025

Council clerk sacked after trying to ensure his...

29 Aug 2025

Four-day working week trial in Scotland’s public sector...

29 Aug 2025

Day one rights in the Employment Rights Bill...

28 Aug 2025

EHRC acts on policies flouting law on single-sex...

28 Aug 2025

  • Work smart – stay well: Avoid unnecessary pain with centred ergonomics SPONSORED | If you often notice...Read more
  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise