Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Case lawPoliceGender reassignment discrimination

A v chief constable of West Yorkshire Police and another [2004] UKHL 21

by Eversheds HR Group 25 May 2004
by Eversheds HR Group 25 May 2004

A question of identity: A, a male-to-female transsexual, applied to become a police constable, but was rejected in 1998 on the grounds that she was a man under English domestic law, and was therefore unable to perform full searching duties. The police force contended it was an occupational requirement that a constable be male or female to carry out searches.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

A brought a claim of sex discrimination, but by the time it reached the Court of Appeal, the European Court of Human Rights had decided the UK law’s lack of recognition of a person’s gender reassignment was a breach of human rights. So the court found the constable was obliged to treat A as a female, and could not discriminate on the basis that she was a transsexual.

The chief constable appealed unsuccessfully to the House of Lords, which relied on the Equal Treatment Directive to reject the appeal.

Eversheds HR Group

previous post
Johnson v Medical Defence Union, [2004] EWHC 347 (Ch)
next post
Pregnant staff and sex discrimination

You may also like

EHRC acts on policies flouting law on single-sex...

28 Aug 2025

Personnel Today Awards 2025 shortlist: Excellence in Public...

22 Aug 2025

British Transport Police first force to hire part-time...

19 Aug 2025

Scottish government faces legal action over gender policies

18 Aug 2025

Police Scotland constable who can’t work in cold...

15 Aug 2025

Police officers receive 4.2% pay rise

4 Aug 2025

Police uniforms don’t fit the bill, research reveals

1 Aug 2025

MPs ‘openly hostile’ to preferred choice for EHRC...

24 Jul 2025

Number of police working second jobs doubles

15 Jul 2025

EHRC defends interim update as ‘balance of clarity...

13 Jun 2025

  • Work smart – stay well: Avoid unnecessary pain with centred ergonomics SPONSORED | If you often notice...Read more
  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise