Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Blunkett promises draft of corporate killing legislation

by Personnel Today 1 Jul 2003
by Personnel Today 1 Jul 2003

Home
secretary said a timetable for the Bill will be published this autumn

The
Government’s long-awaited legislation on corporate man-slaughter is set to
become a reality, after home secretary David Blunkett said a draft Bill would
be published.

A
timetable for the legislation and a clearer outline of what it will contain
will be published in the autumn.

The
legislation was a 1997 manifesto commitment and health and safety campaigners
have become impatient waiting for it to be introduced.

Blunkett
stressed the legislation would target companies rather than the criminal
liability of individual directors, an idea that had been floated in the past.

“The
law needs to be clear and effective in order to secure public confidence. It
must bite properly on large corporations whose failure to set or maintain
standards causes a death. It is not targeted at conscientious companies that
take their health and safety responsibilities seriously,” he said.

Pressure
had been growing on the Government on this issue since 1997, and in 2000 it
published a consultation paper on reforming the law of corporate manslaughter.

Labour
MP Andrew Dismore also recently tabled an amendment to the Government’s
Criminal Justice Bill, designed to tackle the issue.

Any
new laws will be part of the new Bill, not the Criminal Justice Bill, ministers
stressed.

The
TUC welcomed the move, with general secretary Brendan Barber describing it as
“a welcome boost for health and safety at work”.

The
Confederation of British Industry (CBI) described the Government plan as
“common sense”, arguing that Dismore’s amendments had been too harsh on
business.

Michael
Roberts, CBI director of business environment, said: “It is absolutely right
that negligent firms should be prosecuted for gross misconduct that leads to
death. But responsible firms with good health and safety practices must be
treated fairly. We are particularly pleased the Government has avoided the
temptation to target individual directors.”

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Blunkett
stressed unions, companies and business leaders would all be consulted on the
plans.

The
Government had carried out an impact assessment, and preliminary indications
were that the costs of a change in the law would not be large, he added.

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Anti-ageism law could lead to reduced redundancy pay
next post
Government publishes gay equality proposals

You may also like

Dallas Cowboy Cheerleaders receive 400% pay rise

4 Jul 2025

FCA to extend misconduct rules beyond banks

2 Jul 2025

‘Decisive action’ needed to boost workers’ pensions

2 Jul 2025

Business leaders’ drop in confidence impacts headcount

2 Jul 2025

Why we need to rethink soft skills in...

1 Jul 2025

Five misconceptions about hiring refugees

20 Jun 2025

Forward features list 2025 – submitting content to...

23 Nov 2024

Features list 2021 – submitting content to Personnel...

1 Sep 2020

Large firms have no plans to bring all...

26 Aug 2020

A typical work-from-home lunch: crisps

24 Aug 2020

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+