Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Latest NewsEconomics, government & businessJob creation and lossesLabour market

Flexible New Deal for long-term unemployed fails to impress think-tank

by Louisa Peacock 12 Sep 2008
by Louisa Peacock 12 Sep 2008

A scheme to help the long-term unemployed back to work has “serious flaws” that could cause contractors to back off, according to an independent think-tank.

The Department for Work and Pension’s (DWP) Flexible New Deal programme, to be trialled later this year, will open up contracts to private companies that specialise in getting the long-term unemployed into work.

But the Social Market Foundation (SMF) think-tank claimed that the way in which the contracts were being awarded would force firms to make unrealistically cheap bids for the work, causing programme delivery to “collapse”.

Ian Mulheirn, chief economist and author of the body’s report, The Flexible New Deal: Making It Work, said: “The current proposals represent a failure of market design, where contractor and government objectives don’t match. A better tendering process should be established.”

Other flaws identified included the ‘flat-fee’ payments to providers for each person they find a job, which the SMF claimed would effectively encourage firms to write-off the most needy jobseekers.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Stephen Timms, minister for employment and welfare reform, said the scheme would give providers freedom to offer the best personalised services for jobseekers. He added the government would review payment methods as the trials take place.

Welfare-to-work provider A4e secured jobs for 11,000 people in the UK last year, and claimed it could find work for up to 100,000 annually once the system was right. The firm defended the Flexible New Deal programme last week.




Louisa Peacock

previous post
Schools marking fiasco down to poor training, MPs told
next post
Green skills gap could hit UK’s environmental ambitions

You may also like

TUC calls for ‘step change’ as half worry...

27 Aug 2025

Café worker awarded £22k after being too cold...

26 Aug 2025

Royal Mail eCourier drivers bring legal claim over...

26 Aug 2025

Data bias means gender pay gap wider than...

26 Aug 2025

Jobs market continued to struggle during July

26 Aug 2025

Hospitality loses jobs at ‘staggering’ rate since Budget

26 Aug 2025

Charities increasingly relying on ‘shadow’ volunteer workforce

26 Aug 2025

Personnel Today Awards 2025 shortlist: Employee Experience Award

26 Aug 2025

Law firm immigration caseloads up 40%

26 Aug 2025

Bank holidays: six things employers need to know

22 Aug 2025

  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise