Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Belief discriminationEquality, diversity and inclusion

Equality Bill guidance on protected beliefs ‘confusing’ for employers

by Personnel Today 10 Mar 2010
by Personnel Today 10 Mar 2010

Employers are likely to be left confused as to what counts and does not count as a protected belief under the Equality Bill, employers groups have warned.

It follows the publication of a draft Employment Statutory Code of Practice, which explains that vegans, atheists and Scientologists could be given the same protection against discrimination as religious groups, under the legislation.

However, the government has distanced itself from the code, which was published by the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC).

The consultation code states that the term religion can apply to any religion and non-religion, and points out that a belief can mean any religious or philosophical belief. This can include humanism and atheism. In addition, a belief does not need to include a faith or worship of a god, which can cover veganism.

However, a spokesman for the Government Equalities Office said the Equality Bill does not change the existing definition of religion or belief. “The government does not think that views or opinions based on scientific, or indeed on political, theories can be considered to be akin to religious beliefs or philosophical beliefs. Nor was it the intention in introducing the legislation that such beliefs should be covered.”

Employers’ bodies have warned this will send out conflicting messages to employers abut what is and isn’t covered.

Rachel Krys, campaigns director at the Employers Forum on Belief, said the draft code is correct and only interprets what the law says.

“If the government is not happy with the definition, it should have tightened it up in the Bill. The codes are not misinterpretation. It’s not good enough for employers and it leaves them in a difficult position.”

Dianah Worman, diversity adviser at the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development, said confusing messages were being sent out. “Until we get an end result and the Bill is passed, there will still perhaps be an air of confusion. The guidance is moving things in the right direction in terms of setting the agenda.

“Employers have to be in listening mode and be alert, pragmatic and be prepared to manage things in ways that are reasonable. They can’t use a tick-box approach.”

Peter Schofield, director of HR and legal service at manufacturing organisation EEF, said: “There is certainly scope for employers to be confused as to what counts and what does not count as a protected belief. The Code of Practice seems to me the best place to address this issue because you cannot realistically have a list of protected beliefs in the statute.”

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

An EHRC spokeswoman said: “This guidance is not something ‘thought up by the Commission’. Parliament makes the law, the courts interpret it, and the commission offers factual and proportionate guidance to organisations where necessary.”

Last year, Personnel Today reported how a senior manager who alleged he was unfairly dismissed on the basis of his views on climate change could take his employer to a tribunal.

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Christian registrar Ladele loses right to appeal in Supreme Court in gay weddings case
next post
Non-striking civil servants ‘pretended to be answering machines’ to handle volume of calls

You may also like

Fewer workers would comply with a return-to-office mandate

21 May 2025

Redefining leadership: From competence to inclusion

21 May 2025

Consultation launched after Supreme Court ‘sex’ ruling

20 May 2025

EHRC bows to pressure and extends gender consultation

15 May 2025

Culture, ‘micro-incivilities’ and invisible talent

14 May 2025

Why fighting the DEI backlash is about PR...

9 May 2025

So what does the election of a new...

9 May 2025

Rethinking talent: Who was never considered in the...

7 May 2025

Reform UK councils’ staff face WFH ban

6 May 2025

Lincolnshire doctor awarded £250k in race discrimination case

2 May 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+