Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Employment lawEmployment contracts

Legal opinion: Can the Conservatives tamper with the Agency Workers Regulations?

by Personnel Today 12 Apr 2010
by Personnel Today 12 Apr 2010

What scope would a new Conservative government have to tamper with the Agency Workers Regulations 2010, due to come into force on 1 October 2011?

Background

A working person can generally be categorised as an employee, worker or an agency worker, and until recently the agency worker was the last in the queue when handing out employment rights.

Until the Agency Workers Regulations came along, that is. The Agency Workers Regulations 2010 have filtered down from the European Union and into UK law via the Temporary Agency Workers Directive, to give agency workers similar rights to those employees enjoyed.

The regulations also have penalties for agencies and hirers who fail to give agency workers their rights under this new law.

The huge burden these laws will create for UK employers can only be lightened by agreements made in consultation with “social partners”, according to the EU directive.

In the UK, these are the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) and Trade Union Congress (TUC).

In consultation with the government, TUC and CBI agreed agency workers would have to complete 12 continuous calendar weeks in the same role to qualify for equal treatment.

The EU has given member states until 5 December 2011 to put in place national laws that will comply with the provisions of the directive.

The government’s response has been seen in the Agency Workers Regulations, due to come into force on 1 October 2011.

Conservative objections

The Conservatives have objected vocally to the speed with which these regulations have progressed through parliament.

They fear the government is under increasing pressure from trade unions, prompting it to rush through the legislation after only eight weeks of consultation with businesses.

They also believe the regulations will be self defeating as they will discourage end- users from hiring agency workers, cutting off a vital method of getting back into work following the economic downturn.

This suggests that, should the Conservatives win the general election, they would aim to tweak the Agency Workers Regulations to lighten the burden placed on the employer, while encouraging agency work.

But what powers would a Conservative government have to change these regulations? They are law across Great Britain already, and the run-up to their coming into force on 1 October 2011 is designed to allow agencies and hirers to adapt their working practices.

The Conservatives say they will “reduce the burden of red tape which stifles employers – particularly small businesses.” This would be no small task. It is not a case of amending draft papers and furthering debate in parliament, but repealing the legislation (or at least sections of it) to reduce the burden on employers.

The Conservatives could not simply ignore the directive, and fail to implement some or all of the EU law, without suffering more marginalisation in Europe. Our economy, burdened as it is with national debt, could barely afford the possible reprisals.

Conservative MP Jonathan Djanogly wrote in the Conservative Blue Blog, “we need to cut out the gold plating of European directives, repatriate employment law from Brussels to the UK”. This statement hints at withdrawing, at least partially, from the EU, which seems an extreme measure in response to one set of regulations. It is doubtful even the most vociferous of Eurosceptics would advocate this action.

The only realistic option open to a new Conservative government would be to reopen consultation with the TUC and CBI, in the hope that a new agreement could be reached that reduced the burden on business.

The historical relationship between the TUC and Conservative party would not encourage businesses to hold out hope that such an agreement could be easily reached.

The TUC is greatly in favour of the new regulations and could see any proposed changes by the Conservatives as protecting unscrupulous employers at the expense of agency workers.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

The CBI is likely to be far more responsive to amending the regulations to lighten the burden on businesses. So there may be some scope for a new government to come to an agreement with the social partners.

Time is short and the volatile combination of a new Conservative government and the social partners would be under considerable pressure to have a new set of regulations in force by 5 December 2011, especially if they intend to allow agencies and hirers time to adapt their current practices.

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Employee Assistance Professionals Association: New note is fit for purpose
next post
Online job vacancies including HR continue upwards trend

You may also like

Fire and rehire: the relocation question

22 May 2025

Minister defends Employment Rights Bill at Acas conference

16 May 2025

CBI chair Soames accuses ministers of not listening...

16 May 2025

EHRC bows to pressure and extends gender consultation

15 May 2025

Contract cleaner loses EAT race discrimination appeal

14 May 2025

Construction workers win compensation claim against defunct employer

9 May 2025

Zero-hours workers’ rights to be extended from beyond...

8 May 2025

Employment tribunal backlog up 23% in a year

7 May 2025

Ministers urged to outlaw misuse of NDAs

7 May 2025

Bank holidays: six things employers need to know

2 May 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+