Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

AcasLatest NewsDismissalEmployment contracts

Acas launches guidance to dissuade fire and rehire misuse

by Ashleigh Webber 8 Jun 2021
by Ashleigh Webber 8 Jun 2021 British Gas engineers strike over their terms and conditions being changed under a fire and rehire policy.
Photo: Bradley Taylor / Alamy
British Gas engineers strike over their terms and conditions being changed under a fire and rehire policy.
Photo: Bradley Taylor / Alamy

Acas has produced further guidance around negotiating changes to staff contracts in response to concerns about ‘fire and rehire’ practices.

The service was commissioned by the Department for Business, Enterprise and Industrial Strategy to conduct a fact-finding exercise following reports of an increase in employers dismissing staff and re-engaging them on less favourable contracts during the pandemic.

Although Acas found that “fire and rehire” is not a new phenomenon, despite claims it has been used extensively over past year, there is a general concern about a further uptick in dismissals and re-engagement when furlough and Covid-related business support initiatives are wound down.

Acas chief executive Susan Clews said: “Some of the participants told us about the business challenges of Covid-19 and how the use of fire and rehire can help reduce redundancies. Others believe that the practice is unacceptable, and that the pandemic has been used as a ‘smokescreen’ to diminish workers’ terms and conditions.

Fire and rehire

One in 10 threatened to be ‘fired and rehired’

Unions and MPs urge action on ‘fire and rehire’

How to change the terms of existing employment contracts

“There was also evidence that fire and rehire practices have been used for many years and predate the pandemic. We will take up the government’s request to produce further guidance that encourages good workplace practices when negotiating changes to staff contracts.”

Earier this year, the TUC claimed that one in 10 workers have been told to re-apply for their jobs on worse terms and conditions. Dozens of MPs and unions have called for the practice to be outlawed in a letter to the Prime Minister.

Acas’s fact-finding exercise sought views from employer bodies, trade unions, academics, and professional bodies and networks with advisory contact with employers, such as HR and employment lawyers.

Some organisations said that fire and rehire could be regarded as reasonable when used as a last resort – for example, when a solution could not be negotiated and the alternative option was business insolvency.

However, others suggested that fire and rehire is rarely, if ever, justifiable and any use of the practice should be prohibited.

Some participants expressed the view that the current protections against misuse of fire and rehire cannot be enforced, particularly with the employment tribunal system facing a backlog of cases.

Although many suggested legislative reform was needed to stamp out misuse of the practice, others felt non-legislative options would help discourage its use and promote good employee relations. Options for this included non-statutory guidance that reflected case law and greater encouragement of collective bargaining and constructive workplace dialogue.

“Greater restrictions on fire and rehire might result in some employers becoming risk-averse to re-employing dismissed staff in the event that their business takes an upturn (for example, by securing a new business contract) shortly after letting those workers go,” the Acas report said.

“Some participants felt this could have a negative effect, not only on employers’ capacity to recruit skilled workers, but also potentially on the employees themselves. As one commented, ‘it’s worth remembering that restrictions on fire-and-rehire might lead to fire-and-don’t-rehire, rather than retain-and-don’t-fire’.”

Options for legislative reform proposed to Acas included:

  • Reforming the law on unfair dismissal
  • Strengthening employment tribunals’ requirement to scrutinise the business reasons given by employers in fire and rehire dismissals
  • Reforming collective consultation obligations to extend them to workers as well as employees
  • Strengthening employers’ obligations around adherence to procedures under collective agreements
  • Prohibiting the use of wide contractual variation clauses.

Non-legislative reforms proposed included:

  • Producing non-statutory guidance for employers
  • Producing a public messaging statement or campaign
  • Using public procurement and access to government funding to disincentivise fire and rehire
  • Naming and shaming organisations that use fire and rehire.

 

Latest HR job opportunities on Personnel Today

Browse more human resources jobs

Ashleigh Webber
Ashleigh Webber

Ashleigh is editor at OHW+ and HR and wellbeing editor at Personnel Today. Ashleigh's areas of interest include employee health and wellbeing, equality and inclusion and skills development. She has hosted many webinars for Personnel Today, on topics including employee retention, financial wellbeing and menopause support. Prior to joining Personnel Today in 2018, she covered the road transport sector for Commercial Motor and Motor Transport magazines, touching on some of the employment and wellbeing issues experienced by those in road haulage.

previous post
NHS staff shortages ‘biggest driver of burnout’
next post
Quality of jobs unaffected by pandemic

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

You may also like

Staff at FCA vote in favour of industrial...

13 Apr 2022

Strikes off at Clarks as agreement reached with...

1 Dec 2021

Clarks calls in Acas in ‘fire and rehire’...

17 Nov 2021

‘Fire and rehire’: explore alternative options first says...

11 Nov 2021

Care home staff have until Thursday to receive...

10 Sep 2021

Avoid ‘class divide’ in flexible working, TUC warns

15 Jul 2021

Acas: Conflict costs employers almost £30bn a year

11 May 2021

Acas: mental health ‘enlightenment’ a pandemic silver lining

4 Feb 2021

Top 10 Covid-related claims employers could face in...

4 Dec 2020

One third of businesses plan redundancies before Christmas

1 Oct 2020
  • NSPCC revamps its learning strategy with child wellbeing at its heart PROMOTED | The NSPCC’s mission is to prevent abuse and neglect...Read more
  • Diversity versus inclusion: Why the difference matters PROMOTED | It’s possible for an environment to be diverse, but not inclusive...Read more
  • Five steps for organisations across the globe to become more skills-driven PROMOTED | The shift in the world of work has been felt across the globe...Read more
  • The future of workforce development PROMOTED | Northumbria University and partners share insight...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+