Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Age discriminationEquality, diversity and inclusionLatest News

Age discrimination must be top of the agenda

by Mike Berry 25 Oct 2005
by Mike Berry 25 Oct 2005

Age discrimination legislation due to be introduced next year could present companies with larger problems than sex, race or disability discrimination, according to a new study.

The research, commissioned by employment law experts Croner, reveals that ageist stereotypes exist in the workplace and employers need to address grass-roots culture change in time for the October 2006 deadline.

Participants of the study, all employees aged in their 30s to 50s, were unaware of age as a factor in workplace diversity. Ageism was considered more socially acceptable than other prejudices, such as race and religion.

Participants thought that certain jobs in their company came with an age tag, yet accepted this as the ‘way it has always been’ â€“ even if they didn’t agree with this in principle.

Age discrimination is unique in discrimination legislation because it can affect anybody of any age, therefore all employment practices will need to be tested for any inherent ageism.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Christopher J Mellor, head of the Croner businesses, said: “Our exploratory study has shown we have a long way to go in addressing age-related prejudice and has highlighted the uniqueness and enormous scope of this legislation.

“Age is the poor relation in the diversity debate and ageism is worryingly not seen by employees as a workplace crime. Action to promote age diversity taken only by a few companies will not effectively alter the wider culture, and we hope our report will be helpful in establishing this issue onto boardroom agendas across the UK.”

Mike Berry

previous post
Fattism rife in business
next post
Rate of closure of final salary pension schemes slows

You may also like

Bank holidays: six things employers need to know

22 Aug 2025

Exec hauled over coals for sleeping in sauna...

22 Aug 2025

Lidl enters agreement with EHRC to prevent sexual...

22 Aug 2025

Workers need more protection from heatwaves, says WHO

22 Aug 2025

Immigration: huge fall in health and care worker...

22 Aug 2025

Government takes control of UK’s third largest steelworks

22 Aug 2025

X settles severance claims of former Twitter employees

22 Aug 2025

Space X scores court win against US National...

22 Aug 2025

Nature charity unfairly dismisses employee in ‘woeful’ process

22 Aug 2025

What will new workplace heat guidance mean for...

22 Aug 2025

  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise