Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Agency workersHR practice

Agency Workers Directive exemption proposals slammed by unions and business groups

by Guy Logan 18 Jun 2009
by Guy Logan 18 Jun 2009

Unions and business groups have shot down suggested changes to the Agency Worker’s Directive (AWD), which would see temps that earn more than £8.50 per hour exempt from the regulations.


The Association of Recruitment Consultancies (ARC) has proposed that agency workers who earn one-and-a-half times the minimum wage, which currently stands at £5.73 an hour for adults, should not be covered by the directive for the first year of their assignment.


ARC, established in March to represent recruitment firms’ interests, said the move would help temporary workers remain in jobs as they would not be entitled to equal rights to permanent staff after just 12 weeks in the job.


Last week, the Recruitment and Employment Confederation (REC) warned thousands of jobs would be at risk when the AWD comes into force, expected to be by December 2011.


But Anne Fairweather, head of public policy at REC, warned the proposal to cover some temporary workers over others was unworkable.


She told Personnel Today: “We’ve been fighting this directive in various forms over the past decade, but this idea does not fit within the confines of European law. Regardless, this proposal gives the interpretation that an agency worker on minimum wage is vulnerable, and we’re fighting that stereotype.”


TUC general secretary Brendan Barber slammed the idea. “The whole point of the directive is to provide equal treatment between agency workers and those who are directly employed doing the same job,” he said. “The ARC proposal is completely wrong, both on legal and on ethical grounds.”


However, Adrian Marlow, ARC chairman, insisted the change would save thousands of jobs.


Next week, the association will host a seminar on the idea, which shadow minister for corporate governance Jonathon Djanogly is expected to attend.


Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Djanogly said: “We are very concerned by the potential job losses and the way this government has gone about implementing the AWD, and we will listen to what people have to say about the directive.”


However, he refused to be drawn on whether the Tories backed the ARC’s proposal.

Guy Logan

previous post
Jaguar Land Rover redundancy alternatives boost staff engagement
next post
Penna implements Bond Adapt to support substantial growth

You may also like

Petition calls for rethink on NHS agency staff...

19 Aug 2025

Recruitment: don’t write off personality tests amid AI...

7 Aug 2025

HR software firm discriminated against woman on maternity...

25 Jul 2025

Coldplay couple: why should they lose their jobs?

25 Jul 2025

Court of Appeal rules that Ryanair agency pilot...

9 Jul 2025

With HR absence rising, is your people team...

24 Jun 2025

Healthdaq: Shaking up health and social care recruitment

11 Jun 2025

NHS England cuts agency spend by £1bn

2 Jun 2025

Court of Appeal hears Ryanair pilot’s worker status...

1 Apr 2025

What do HR specialists enjoy most about their...

21 Mar 2025

  • Work smart – stay well: Avoid unnecessary pain with centred ergonomics SPONSORED | If you often notice...Read more
  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise