Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Case lawEmployment lawDiscriminationEqual pay

Asda fails to block mass equal pay tribunal claim

by Stephen Simpson 23 Jun 2016
by Stephen Simpson 23 Jun 2016 Mark Newcombe/REX/Shutterstock.
Mark Newcombe/REX/Shutterstock.

Supermarket giant Asda has failed in its bid to have a mass equal pay claim against it transferred from the employment tribunal to the High Court.

Equal pay in the private sector

Cases on appeal: keep track of the Asda equal pay claim

Sign up to our free gender pay gap reporting service

Webinar: Are you prepared for gender pay gap reporting?

Around 7,000 claimants have brought a group equal pay claim against Asda in the employment tribunal.

The claimants – both male and female – are seeking to compare their jobs in Asda retail stores with the jobs of colleagues who work in distribution centres.

The claimants contend that historically work done in the retail stores has been perceived as “women’s work” and thought to be worth less than work in the distribution depots, which was traditionally perceived as men’s work.

Asda applied to have the employment tribunal proceedings stayed indefinitely, which would in effect compel the claimants to pursue their case in the High Court.

After unsuccessfully applying to the employment tribunal and Employment Appeal Tribunal, Asda’s application to have the case stayed went to the Court of Appeal.

Lord Falconer QC, who represented Asda in the appeal court, submitted that the complexity of this “highly exceptional, indeed unique” case merited a move to the High Court.

He pointed to the many aspects of the claim that are disputed, including:

  • the appropriateness of the comparators;
  • whether or not the jobs are of equal value;
  • whether or not any difference in pay is due to non-discriminatory material factors; and
  • the potential remedies.

Lord Falconer drew a distinction between employment tribunals’ experience of large-scale equal pay cases in the public sector – typically involving local authorities or the NHS – and the “massively more complex” task of considering equal pay in the private sector.

Equal pay in the private sector: “overblown hyperbole”?

“[Lord Falconer QC] says that this is by far the most important, complex and financially significant equal pay claim ever pursued in the private sector.

If successful, it will have an enormous effect not only on Asda and all its 150,000 employees, but also on the retail trade generally.

Indeed, he goes so far as to assert that ‘because the ripple effects of the case will be huge, it is probably the case which will have the single largest effect on the economy of the UK in recent years’.”

Extract from Court of Appeal judgment in Asda Stores Ltd v Brierley and others

The claimants submitted that Lord Falconer’s arguments were “overblown hyperbole”.

They accepted that the case is complex, but said that it does not raise significantly different issues to previous equal pay claims in the public sector.

In its judgment in Asda Stores Ltd v Brierley and others, the Court of Appeal roundly rejected Asda’s attempt to have the case moved.

The Court of Appeal acknowledged that claims can be moved to another forum if there is a better place for the case to be heard.

Equal pay cases can and do move from the High Court to the employment tribunal, for example where it is more convenient for the tribunal to consider whether or not jobs are of equal value.

However, Parliament has not legislated for tribunals to have discretion to order a move in the opposite direction.

The Court of Appeal also highlighted the “very significant practical consequences” for the claimants of a move to the High Court.

For example, the claimants would to have to start proceedings again, with the additional stress and court fees this would involve, and there would be a greater risk of costs being awarded if the claimants lost.

In a statement reacting to the judgment, Asda said: “The ruling from the Court of Appeal relates solely to the way the case will proceed in the courts – it has nothing to do with the merits of the case itself. Whilst we disagree with the decision, we continue to strongly dispute the claims being made against us in the employment tribunal.”

The statement continued: “This is a legal case about different rates of pay for different jobs. We believe that jobs in question are very different in terms of their demands, and we strongly dispute the claims being made.

“At Asda, people doing the same job are paid the same. Men and women doing the same job in our retail stores are paid the same. Men and women doing the same job in our distribution and logistics centre are paid the same. Pay rates in stores and depots differ for legitimate reasons, including the different market rates for different jobs.”

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

The Court of Appeal ruling means that the case will continue to proceed through the employment tribunal system.

More on the Court of Appeal decision in Asda Stores Ltd v Brierley and others, including analysis of its implications for employers, is available on XpertHR.

Asda
Stephen Simpson

Stephen Simpson is Principal HR Strategy and Practice Editor at Brightmine. His areas of responsibility include the policies and documents and law reports. After obtaining a law degree and training to be a solicitor, he moved into publishing, initially with Butterworths. He joined Brightmine in its early days in 2001.

previous post
Seven signs to test for wellbeing readiness
next post
Pay settlements creep back towards 2% benchmark

You may also like

Fire and rehire: the relocation question

22 May 2025

Consultation launched after Supreme Court ‘sex’ ruling

20 May 2025

Minister defends Employment Rights Bill at Acas conference

16 May 2025

RCN warns Darlington NHS trust over single-sex spaces

16 May 2025

CBI chair Soames accuses ministers of not listening...

16 May 2025

EHRC bows to pressure and extends gender consultation

15 May 2025

Contract cleaner loses EAT race discrimination appeal

14 May 2025

Construction workers win compensation claim against defunct employer

9 May 2025

Zero-hours workers’ rights to be extended from beyond...

8 May 2025

Employment tribunal backlog up 23% in a year

7 May 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+