Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Avoid Your Own Office ‘Svengate’

by Personnel Today 10 Aug 2004
by Personnel Today 10 Aug 2004

A
workplace policy covering sexual relationships between colleagues could help HR
managers avoid tangled difficulties such as ‘Svengate’, writes Paul Yandall

The
revelations of alleged relationships between a secretary at the FA and both its
chief executive and the England coach Sven Goran Eriksson have highlighted the
difficulties office romances can cause.

Although
intimate relationships between work colleagues are not unusual, and rarely
cause problems, they can be fraught for employers if they cause resentment
among other workers or end badly.

And
when one party is in a position of authority over the other, the potential for
serious employment law problems increases dramatically, says Will Clayton, a
partner at specialist law firm Dent, Raven & Marsdens.

“The
less senior colleague may find it difficult to accept managerial instructions
from their former partner as easily as they would have had they not had an
affair,” says Clayton.

Alternatively,
other employees may feel they have grounds for a claim against their employer
if they think they have been treated unfavourably by a manager compared to that
manager’s partner.

“A
senior executive who abuses managerial powers in situations of this kind could
be vulnerable to disciplinary action or dismissal, depending on the severity of
the offence,” says Clayton.

So
what can employers do to ensure such relationships don’t cause problems? Can
employers simply ban intimate relationships between employees? Can they afford
to ignore them?

“To
try to ban relationships would be difficult because of [privacy] laws, and also
a little unrealistic,” says Kate Ormrod, an employment law specialist at Aaron
and Partners.

Recent
research shows workplace romances are on the rise as more women enter the workplace,
particularly into formerly male-dominated professions, and as people spend more
time at work.

“In
the US, it’s much more commonplace to have a ‘no dating’ agreement, which
people have to sign up to, but hardly anyone here has them,” says Ormrod.

“I
think there’s a feeling in Britain that to try and stop these types of
relationships is going a bit too far – a bit like using a sledgehammer to crack
a nut.”

But
that does not mean employers cannot not take steps to protect their
organisation if problems arise.

A
workplace policy covering family as well as sexual relationships could help
employers and employees during times of friction or sensitive conflicts of
interest, says Ormrod.

A
well-drafted policy could remind staff to take extra care when a professional
inequality existed in the relationship, and also highlight the company’s
harassment policy so that partners know their rights if problems arise.

It
could also provide for the relationship to be reported in confidence to a
senior manager and might have to entail a provision for a change in reporting
structure for the employees involved.

HR
managers often have to walk a fine line between respecting the privacy of the
employees in a relationship and ensuring the workplace functions smoothly.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

“But
trying to dictate or to be heavy-handed would be overstepping the mark for most
organisations,” says Ormrod.

“The
key is openness, honesty and tackling issues head-on before they become a
problem.”

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Most UK firms guilty of sex discrimination
next post
TUC pre-empts Olympics with anti-sweatshop campaign

You may also like

Dallas Cowboy Cheerleaders receive 400% pay rise

4 Jul 2025

FCA to extend misconduct rules beyond banks

2 Jul 2025

‘Decisive action’ needed to boost workers’ pensions

2 Jul 2025

Business leaders’ drop in confidence impacts headcount

2 Jul 2025

Why we need to rethink soft skills in...

1 Jul 2025

Five misconceptions about hiring refugees

20 Jun 2025

Forward features list 2025 – submitting content to...

23 Nov 2024

Features list 2021 – submitting content to Personnel...

1 Sep 2020

Large firms have no plans to bring all...

26 Aug 2020

A typical work-from-home lunch: crisps

24 Aug 2020

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+