Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Latest NewsEqual payRetailPay & benefits

Boots to face equal pay legal challenge

by Adam McCulloch 7 Nov 2019
by Adam McCulloch 7 Nov 2019 REX/Shutterstock
REX/Shutterstock

Thousands of Boots in-store employees in England, Scotland and Wales could be eligible to join an equal pay claim against the high street giant. If the case is successful, Boots could owe their in-store employees more than £100m in back pay.

So far more than 550 current and former mostly female employees of the retailer have signed up to the legal action through solicitor Roscoe Reid, in partnership with Pay Justice. Many more are expected to join, according to the law firm, which represents claimants involved in a similar case with Morrisons and has achieved settlements in equal pay cases against Birmingham and Glasgow councils.

Supermarket equal pay claims

Asda equal pay case heads for Supreme Court

Sainsbury’s fails to get equal pay claim struck out

Morrisons faces fresh equal pay claim

Thousands of Tesco staff join new equal pay claim

The claim is on the grounds that in-store staff, the vast majority of whom are women, are paid less than the business’s predominantly male warehouse workers. Campaigners, with past and present employees of Boots have calculated that in-store staff are paid £0.73 less per hour than their distribution centre co-workers. This is in breach of the Equality Act 2010, which states that men and women should be paid equally for jobs of equal value, claimed campaign group Pay Justice.

Research by Pay Justice found that many Boots in-store staff – men and women – agreed that their roles entailed the same amount of effort as warehouse staff. A claimant who has worked in a Boots store for 15 years said: “Our job is quite physical, cages come in and we have to unload them. It’s quite heavy work, actually. A lot of it is customer service, but now, around Christmas, we have pallets to unload, so the work is quite manual. You’re given more and more work to do and there’s not enough hours in the day to do it, because of the staff cuts.”

Another added: “I had no idea that the distribution workers were being paid more than us.”

Lead lawyer at Roscoe Reid, Ellie Pinnells, told Personnel Today that 73p might not sound a lot of money [at Morrisons, for example, the difference is around £1.50 per hour] but for staff who have worked at Boots for several years it represented a large amount of lost income.

Pinnells added that equal pay cases were being held up to some extent by the attitude of Asda, which being owned by US giant Walmart, had been fighting every point and appealing every judgment. She said: “They’ll be a kind of slipstream behind the Asda case,” which is currently waiting for a Supreme Court ruling.

Roscoe Reid and Pay Justice hope that retailers will eventually settle with the claimants and commit to job evaluations, rewarding staff fairly. “If I was Boots I’d do that now then settle on the back of it,” she said.

She told Personnel Today that, initially, people felt uncomfortable suing their own employer but as more people come forward the feeling of protection in numbers operates. “The ones who have left Boots already don’t mind coming forward,” she added. The problems facing all high street retailers had made people fearful of losing their jobs, she added, but it was wrong to think that claiming fair pay could lead to that being more likely.

“I can’t believe we’ve had equal pay since the 1970 Act and women are still undervalued and underpaid,” said Pinnells. “We’ll fight hard for those who have been treated unfairly to obtain justice.”

If successful, claimants could see winnings in the thousands, all worked out according to individualised calculations.

The Boots case is one in a series of equal pay claims run against big brands like Asda, Morrisons, Sainsbury’s, Tesco and Next.

Sam Smethers, Fawcett Society chief executive, said: “We repeatedly see cases where male-dominated jobs are paid more than those done by women, yet without any objective justification which can stand up to any scrutiny.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

“Arguably, customer-facing roles should be paid more not less than warehouse staff. It all comes back to who and what we value and we see women consistently undervalued and underpaid. These women are absolutely right to challenge it and I suspect they will win.”

Boots, which employs about 54,000 people in 2,465 stores, 606 Boots Opticians practices, and 512 Boots Hearingcare locations, has been contacted by Personnel Today for a comment.

Adam McCulloch

Adam McCulloch first worked for Personnel Today magazine in the early 1990s as a sub editor. He rejoined Personnel Today as a writer in 2017, covering all aspects of HR but with a special interest in diversity, social mobility and industrial relations. He has ventured beyond the HR realm to work as a freelance writer and production editor in sectors including travel (The Guardian), aviation (Flight International), agriculture (Farmers' Weekly), music (Jazzwise), theatre (The Stage) and social work (Community Care). He is also the author of KentWalksNearLondon. Adam first became interested in industrial relations after witnessing an exchange between Arthur Scargill and National Coal Board chairman Ian McGregor in 1984, while working as a temp in facilities at the NCB, carrying extra chairs into a conference room!

previous post
Train maintenance workers’ health ‘at risk’ from sewage on railway lines, warns union
next post
Royal Mail seeks High Court injunction on Christmas strike action

2 comments

Cathie Warren 15 Nov 2019 - 3:27 pm

I am an ex employee of Boots how do I make a claim please

Thank you

Grace Kaddu 21 Jan 2020 - 6:07 pm

I am current employee of Boots and I would like to know how l can make a claim.

Comments are closed.

You may also like

Eight new equality laws in the pipeline

10 Apr 2025

Barnet Council to face equal pay claim worth...

26 Mar 2025

Have group litigation claims advanced pay equality?

26 Mar 2025

Equality at work: ‘Men are out of touch’

28 Feb 2025

Asda workers advance to final stage in equal...

3 Feb 2025

Morrisons workers move forward in equal pay claim

17 Jan 2025

Birmingham City Council to settle 6,000 equal pay...

10 Dec 2024

Four BBC presenters launch equal pay appeal

29 Nov 2024

Disney agrees $43.3m gender pay settlement

27 Nov 2024

Employment Rights Bill: government outlines next steps for...

10 Oct 2024

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+