Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Equality, diversity and inclusionLatest NewsFamily-friendly workingFlexible workingRecruitment & retention

Care home company pays price for ignoring flexible work request

by Mike Berry 17 Aug 2005
by Mike Berry 17 Aug 2005

A part-time payroll worker whose employer demanded she start working full-time and refused to consider suitable flexible work options has been awarded £29,294 in damages by the Southampton Employment Tribunal.


Her case was supported by the Equal Opportunities Commission (EOC). The award included an extra £2,000 in aggravated damages for the manner in which the case was conducted by the respondents. The tribunal said this treatment added “insult to the injury already suffered”.


In June 2004, Jane Giles was hired as a part-time payroll clerk on a 16-hours-per-week contract by Cornelia Care Homes, a Hampshire-based company. A single parent with a two-year-old son, Giles took the part-time position to be able to meet her childcare responsibilities.


However, in January of 2005, her employer demanded that she start working full-time.


Giles presented her employers with several reasonable flexible work options, including sharing her job with another part-time payroll worker on a similar 16-hour contract — bringing the total number of hours close to that of a full time position — or working the additional hours from home. Her employer refused, demanding that she work a minimum of 25 hours per week in the office. This left her no other option but to resign.


In its defence, Cornelia Care Homes argued that the change to a full-time position was necessary due to “the rapid growth of the company”, and that it would have little control over Giles if she worked at home.


The tribunal said Cornelia Care Homes was guilty of indirect discriminating against Giles on the basis of sex. Furthermore, the tribunal increased the award by 40% because Cornelia Care Homes ignored the official grievance filed by Giles.


Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Jenny Watson, acting chair of the EOC said: “Forward-looking employers are already recognising men and women’s caring responsibilities, adopting innovative approaches to flexible work and seeing the results of pro-active efforts to attract and retain talented staff in their bottom line. As this case demonstrates, failing to do so can have costly consequences.


An EOC report earlier this year into part-time and flexible work found that half of women working part-time are working in jobs below their proven potential.

Mike Berry

previous post
London does the business when it comes to conferences
next post
Four-fold rise in road-worker deaths

You may also like

Decision to sack man for Michael Jackson noises...

29 Aug 2025

P&O Ferries boss who steered 800 sackings steps...

29 Aug 2025

UK large companies’ succession planning is weak –...

29 Aug 2025

Gender bonus bias widens pay gap, says Brightmine

29 Aug 2025

Bankers learn of redundancy in email gaffe asking...

29 Aug 2025

Cabin crew manager with ‘flirty banter’ loses discrimination...

29 Aug 2025

Council clerk sacked after trying to ensure his...

29 Aug 2025

Four-day working week trial in Scotland’s public sector...

29 Aug 2025

How to employ a global workforce from the...

28 Aug 2025

Day one rights in the Employment Rights Bill...

28 Aug 2025

  • Work smart – stay well: Avoid unnecessary pain with centred ergonomics SPONSORED | If you often notice...Read more
  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise