Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Employee relationsEmployment lawEquality, diversity and inclusionDisabilityEmployment tribunals

Case round-up: Child Support Agency (Dudley) v Truman and Countrywide Estate Agents & others v Rice

by Personnel Today 4 Mar 2009
by Personnel Today 4 Mar 2009

The Employment Appeal Tribunal has confirmed that last year’s House of Lords decision on disability discrimination (London Borough of Lewisham v Malcolm), which made it much harder for people with disabilities to bring disability discrimination claims, also applies to employment cases.

When deciding if a disabled person has been treated less favourably for a reason related to their disability, the disabled person must compare their treatment to that of another person (comparator). In Malcolm, the Lords considered who the comparator should be, and in doing so completely changed the law that had applied for many years.

In Malcolm, the House of Lords said that the correct analysis is to compare the way the disabled person has been treated to the way that a non-disabled person in the same situation would have been treated. If the disabled person has been dismissed for sickness absence, the correct comparator is someone without a disability who has had the same period of sickness absence. If the non-disabled person has also been dismissed, there is no discrimination.

This reversal of the previous law made it much harder for people with disabilities to bring disability related discrimination claims.

However, Malcolm was not an employment case it was about the treatment of a disabled council tenant, who was evicted by Lewisham Council when he unlawfully sublet his flat. Even though the test for disability related discrimination in the housing context is identical to that in the employment context, when the House of Lords’ decision was published, there was some debate as to whether it would also apply to employment cases.

It is now clear that it will.

Key points

  • The correct comparator in an employment disability-related discrimination claim is a non-disabled person in the same situation as the disabled employee
  • It is now much harder for employees to bring disability related discrimination claims
  • Employees can still bring claims for unfair dismissal if long-term absence dismissals are not handled properly
  • Employees are likely to bring claims for failure to make reasonable adjustments instead

What you should do

  • Make all reasonable adjustments that can be made to support disabled employees at work.
  • Before absence-related dismissals, continue to take reasonable steps to facilitate a return to work
  • Remember the Equality Bill may undo the changes in Malcolm.

Avatar
Personnel Today

previous post
UK won’t sign Illegal Workers’ Directive
next post
Case of the month: Schultz-Hoff v Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund Stringer and others v HM Revenue & Customs

You may also like

Who is on strike and when?

29 Nov 2023

Train driver unfairly dismissed after tarantula prank

28 Nov 2023

Former Jaguar Land Rover employee awarded £148k for...

27 Nov 2023

Cruise giant accused of planning ‘fire and rehire’...

24 Nov 2023

Burges Salmon takes home 2023 Employment Law Firm...

21 Nov 2023

McDonald’s: How can employers prevent sexual harassment?

21 Nov 2023

Browne Jacobson takes home 2023 Equality, Diversity and...

21 Nov 2023

Entain and McLaren F1 are favourites in the...

21 Nov 2023

Two-thirds say periods have negative impact on work

20 Nov 2023

Tesco equal pay test cases to move to...

17 Nov 2023

  • Global growth with simple HR compliance (webinar) WEBINAR | In an increasingly global marketplace...Read more
  • Talent acquisition: How AI can complement a ‘back to basics’ approach PROMOTED | Artificial intelligence is now...Read more
  • What will it mean to be an HR professional in 2024? (webinar) WEBINAR | As we approach 2024...Read more
  • HR Budget Planning for 2024: Preparing your People Strategy PROMOTED | As organisations continue to adapt...Read more
  • Almost a fifth of UK workers feel undervalued – we need to solve this PROMOTED | A new report has found...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2023

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2023 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+