Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Case lawEquality, diversity and inclusionSex discrimination

Compensation for sex discrimination: Miles v Gilbank

by Personnel Today 13 Dec 2006
by Personnel Today 13 Dec 2006

This case serves as a useful warning that both individuals and employers can be held liable in cases of discrimination.


The Sex Discrimination Act 1975 (section 42) makes provision for individuals to be liable if they have knowingly aided another person in an act of discrimination. Here, the EAT ruled that the manager’s behaviour was so bad that she was made personally responsible (along with the company) for 100% of the £25,000 award for injury to feelings.


Ms Miles was the manager of a hairdressing salon where Ms Gilbank worked as a senior hair designer. She was also the director and majority shareholder of the salon.


When Gilbank informed Miles that she was pregnant, she claimed she was subjected to discrimination, bullying and a lack of concern for the welfare of her unborn child. Gilbank was not allowed to alter her working day to accommodate the fact that she was pregnant. This meant she was not allowed to take the breaks that had been advised by her doctor, and she had to continue to handle substances that posed a health risk to the baby. Gilbank was also only paid for half of her statutory maternity period.

In finding in favour of Gilbank, the Court of Appeal held that Miles had fostered an “inhumane and sustained campaign of bullying and discrimination” which had been “targeted, deliberate, repeated and consciously inflicted”.


Key points




  • Although unusual, the courts are prepared to find an individual liable if they have aided a company’s discriminatory acts. In this case, the fact that Miles was also the owner of the business, which had subsequently gone into liquidation, did not help her. By fostering a culture of bullying and by joining in herself, Miles was aiding the unlawful discrimination.


  • The tribunal will award high levels of compensation for injury to feelings even if the discrimination occurs for a relatively short period of time (ie, throughout pregnancy).

What you should do




  • Make employees aware that they could be personally liable for their actions.


  • Ensure that a sufficient risk assessment is carried out to highlight and remove any potential risk to the health of the pregnant employee or her child.


  • Attend the hearing. The tribunal was critical of the fact Miles did not attend the hearing to give evidence and she did not help herself by failing to appear.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

3 out of 5 stars


(Star rating: Each case is rated from one to five stars: the more essential it is that you know about it, the more stars it will have.)

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Disability discrimination – failure to consult over reasonable adjustments: Tarbuck v Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd, EAT
next post
Meaning of ‘pre-existing agreement’ under ICE regulations: Moray Council v Stewart

You may also like

One in eight senior NHS managers from black...

1 Jul 2025

Progressive DEI policy is a red line for...

27 Jun 2025

BBC Breakfast bullying and misconduct allegations under investigation

20 Jun 2025

Finance professionals expect less emphasis on ESG and...

18 Jun 2025

Lack of role models a ‘barrier’ for people...

17 Jun 2025

Pride 2025: why corporate allyship still matters

16 Jun 2025

EHRC defends interim update as ‘balance of clarity...

13 Jun 2025

HR is second ‘most sexist profession’ survey suggests

13 Jun 2025

Racism claims have tripled and ‘Equality Act is...

12 Jun 2025

School’s bid to appeal Kristie Higgs ruling refused...

11 Jun 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+