Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Sexual harassmentBullying and harassmentLatest NewsSME

Could #MeToo clauses for start-ups put a stop to harassment?

by David Greenhalgh 5 Apr 2019
by David Greenhalgh 5 Apr 2019 Burger/Phanie/Shutterstock
Burger/Phanie/Shutterstock

Investors in start-ups are putting young companies under increased scrutiny to ensure they have a clean record on sexual harassment. How effective are these so-called #MeToo clauses, asks David Greenhalgh?  

The Financial Times recently reported that investors in tech start-ups are increasingly including so-called #MeToo clauses in investment agreements.

The clauses are designed to include a warranty from the company to the investor that there have been no complaints around sexual harassment issues, with an obligation to disclose any such future complaints.

#MeToo clauses

Podcast: #MeToo – sexual harassment in the workplace 

Sexual harassment to be tackled under new 12-point plan 

Broadly speaking, parties to a commercial contract are free to agree to whatever terms they like, provided that such terms are not illegal. There is no reason, therefore, why a warranty or obligation of this type, properly drafted, would not be legally enforceable.

As with many contractual provisions, the practical difficulty for the enforcing party is knowing about and proving breach.

Are they effective?

The effectiveness of these clauses will depend on what remedies are available to investors if a start-up is in breach. Typically, a party seeking to bring a breach of warranty can only recover damages for which they will need to show that they have suffered loss.

The most likely loss to the investor will be damage to reputation, which is inherently difficult to quantify. So, the financial value of a potential claim might not be sufficiently large to deter the start-up from taking the risk of attempting to cover up a harassment complaint.

If the company is in breach of a representation that there have been no such complaints in the past – and it becomes apparent that that representation was untrue – then the investor could potentially pull the investment altogether.

Does the lack of an HR function (as may often be the case with smaller start-ups) mean a lack of proper procedures and policies in place to deal with conduct?”

If there is a contractual obligation to report any such future complaints, this may well incentivise the start-up to work on avoiding any such complaints arising in the first place.

Disgruntled employees who are aware of any obligation for the company to report such matters to the investor may well use the threat of making a formal complaint as tactical leverage to try and get a good exit package.

Deciding to disclose

What happens in the event that the start-up does comply with a #MeToo clause, for example by disclosing to the investor at an early stage the details of alleged sexual harassment in their workplace?

Investors may include supplementary terms that, in the event of an incident of sexual harassment, there will be some form of penalty.

However, this would seem slightly counter-productive; a start-up would be less likely to disclose if it meant the application of a penalty or perhaps even termination/recoupment of the investment and may result in a start-up covering up such an incident.

One would hope that the intention of investors in including a #MeToo clause is to encourage start-ups to think about taking preventative measures to ensure that sexual harassment doesn’t happen at all, and to offer support in dealing appropriately with such incidents if they do arise.

A start-up problem?

The start-up dealing with a relevant complaint would need to be very careful about what it disclosed to the investor in terms of protecting the confidentiality and personal data of the employees concerned.

The growing inclusion of #MeToo clauses in contracts with start-ups may raise questions about the working practices of such companies.

Is the more informal working environment of start-ups more fertile ground for inappropriate behaviour – perhaps with staff working long hours and frequently socialising together?

Does the lack of an HR function (as may often be the case with smaller start-ups) mean a lack of proper procedures and policies in place to deal with conduct?

Do victims of sexual harassment feel less comfortable about raising an issue for fear that word will spread quickly in a more close-knit workplace? For some companies, particularly the smallest start-ups, the answer to those questions may well be “yes”.

However, there is another good reason why the focus of #MeToo clauses is on start-ups: investment.

By their very nature start-ups require investment to grow and therefore they need to attract investors. Investors will expect to have a close relationship with the start-up and will be keen to protect their reputation.

Although #MeToo clauses may be starting life in start-up investment contracts, increasingly sexual harassment enquiries are being conducted as part of due diligence in larger scale investments and mergers and acquisitions of big corporations.

A real change?

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

The emergence of #MeToo clauses in commercial agreements and the increasing inclusion of sexual harassment enquiries in corporate due diligence hints at a cultural shift in the approach of businesses to this type of behaviour.

Of course, companies will be eager to maintain and protect their reputations but regardless of the motivation, one hopes that positive change will come from employers taking sexual harassment more seriously.

David Greenhalgh

David Greenhalgh is a partner in the employment team at law firmJoelson

previous post
Shared parental leave should be ‘overhauled’
next post
Why it’s time to compel all employers to publish parental policies

You may also like

Consultation launched after Supreme Court ‘sex’ ruling

20 May 2025

Ministers urged to outlaw misuse of NDAs

7 May 2025

BBC to ‘act immediately’ on workplace culture review

28 Apr 2025

Eight new equality laws in the pipeline

10 Apr 2025

Philip Green loses human rights case at ECHR

8 Apr 2025

Darlington nurses’ changing room case delayed to October

3 Apr 2025

Woman asked ‘why do you want to work’...

3 Apr 2025

Former minister calls for end to ‘two-tier’ use...

2 Apr 2025

Primark boss resigns after ‘error of judgment’

31 Mar 2025

Sullivan Review shows how ‘sex’ has been purged...

20 Mar 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+