Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Disability discriminationDisabilityLatest News

Court of Appeal: Dismissal for behaviour related to disability was discrimination

by Ashleigh Webber 16 May 2018
by Ashleigh Webber 16 May 2018 A teacher was dismissed after showing 15-16 year old students 18-rated 'Halloween'.
Moviestore Collection/REX/Shutterstock
A teacher was dismissed after showing 15-16 year old students 18-rated 'Halloween'.
Moviestore Collection/REX/Shutterstock

Employers could be liable for disability discrimination if they dismiss employees for behaviour that is related to their disability, the Court of Appeal has ruled.

It upheld that it was disability discrimination to dismiss a teacher for showing an 18-rated film to 15 to 16-year-old students, on the basis that the teacher, who had cystic fibrosis, was suffering from stress at the time.

Disability discrimination

Is it a breach of the law on disability discrimination to ask about health during recruitment?

EAT rules that perceiving condition as a disability is discriminatory

It agreed with the decision that the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) had made in City of York Council v Grosset, despite the fact  the school had dismissed the teacher without knowing the misconduct had arisen from his disability.

The teacher, Mr Grosset, was awarded £646,000 in compensation.

The council had been aware Mr Grosset suffered from cystic fibrosis. Adjustments had been made to help him manage his condition when he started working at the school, but after a change in head teacher – who was not made aware of his condition – some adjustments fell away.

The change in head teacher and changes to examinations led to an increase in his workload, which exacerbated his condition and made him feel stressed. Mr Grosset showed the 18-rated film ‘Halloween’ to the students, claiming this was down to stress. He was suspended and subsequently dismissed for gross misconduct.

After the EAT dismissed the council’s appeal against the decision that it had discriminated against Mr Grosset because of his disability, the case went to the Court of Appeal. It considered whether the council had treated the teacher unfavourably because of “something”, and whether that “something” – ie, showing the film – arose in consequence of his cystic fibrosis.

Lord Justice Sales agreed that the teacher showed the film as a result of the “exceptionally high stress he was subject to”, which arose from the effect of his disability when new and increased demands were made of him.

“A particularly strong factor underlying the employment tribunal’s conclusion that the dismissal was not proportionate was its unchallenged assessment that, if the respondent had put in place reasonable adjustments as required by sections 20 and 21 Equality Act, by reducing the work pressure on the claimant, he would not have been subjected to the same level of stress,” Lord Justice Sales said.

The decision means employers should ensure they investigate the reasons behind the behaviour of an employee they know is disabled, according to Emma Burrows, employment partner at Trowers & Hamlins.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

“When it comes to claims for discrimination arising from disability, an employer will only escape liability if it did not know, and could not reasonably have been expected to know, that the employee had a disability, save for arguing that the employee is not disabled at all. The fact that the employer does not know that the disability produced a certain consequence will be irrelevant,” she warned.

The headline and introduction of this article was altered on 17 May to better reflect the judgment.

Ashleigh Webber

Ashleigh is a former editor of OHW+ and former HR and wellbeing editor at Personnel Today. Ashleigh's areas of interest include employee health and wellbeing, equality and inclusion and skills development. She has hosted many webinars for Personnel Today, on topics including employee retention, financial wellbeing and menopause support.

previous post
Carillion culture was “rotten” and directors failed to act, says report
next post
Manufacturers should invest in wellbeing to boost productivity

You may also like

Welfare cuts would ‘undermine workforce inclusion and business...

27 Jun 2025

Lack of role models a ‘barrier’ for people...

17 Jun 2025

Disability harassment and discrimination ‘shockingly high’

3 Jun 2025

Half with MS have left a job because...

3 Jun 2025

Sighing in frustration at colleague was discriminatory, judge...

23 May 2025

Connect to Work: how businesses can play their...

2 May 2025

Eight new equality laws in the pipeline

10 Apr 2025

HR and businesses respond to Spring Statement

26 Mar 2025

HMRC worker sent birthday card awarded £25k for...

21 Mar 2025

Disability pay gap reporting could have unintended consequences

19 Mar 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+