Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Corporate governanceLatest NewsPensions

Carillion culture was “rotten” and directors failed to act, says report

by Jo Faragher 16 May 2018
by Jo Faragher 16 May 2018 Richard Howson, former chief executive of Carillion, leaves after giving evidence to the select committee about its collapse
Mark Thomas/REX/Shutterstock
Richard Howson, former chief executive of Carillion, leaves after giving evidence to the select committee about its collapse
Mark Thomas/REX/Shutterstock

The board of directors at failed construction firm Carillion were “both responsible and culpable” for its failure, according to a damning report published today by two select committees.

Corporate governance

Construction firms ‘slack’ around modern slavery

Consultation launched into corporate governance, executive pay and representation at board level

The Work and Pensions Committee and the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee said that “Carillion’s rise and spectacular fall was a story of recklessness, hubris and greed”, and that even as the company collapsed, its directors were only concerned with protecting their “generous executive bonuses”.

Carillion went bankrupt in January, leading to the loss of thousands of jobs. Hundreds of its public contracts, such as school meal services, had to be brought under Government control.

The report described the culture at Carillion as “rotten”, and claimed that internal and external checks and balances that could have prevented its failure were completely absent.

It singled out three individuals as having been particularly influential in its collapse: former finance director Richard Adam, who “resolutely refused to make adequate contributions to the company’s pension schemes”; former chief executive Richard Howson, whose leadership it describes as “misguidedly self-assured”; and Philip Green, who was chairman when Carillion collapsed.

The committees recommended to the Insolvency Service that it considers whether these directors were in breach of the Companies Act, meaning they could face disqualification from future director duties.

Furthermore, Carillion’s non-executive directors “failed to scrutinise or challenge reckless executives”.

Its auditors and consultants also came under fire: Deloitte, KPMG, PWC and EY are described as a “cosy club incapable of providing the degree of independent challenge needed”.

The committees added that “correcting the systemic flaws” of the company’s collapse would be a huge challenge, but that the Government could use this as an opportunity for corporate governance reform and to give regulators greater powers to challenge reckless corporate behaviour.

It concluded: “It can grasp the initiative with an ambitious and wide-ranging set of reforms that reset our systems of corporate accountability in the long-term public interest. It would have our support in doing so.”

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Frank Field, chair of the Work and Pensions Committee said: “Same old story. Same old greed. A board of directors too busy stuffing their mouths with gold to show any concern for the welfare of their workforce or their pensioners.

“They rightly face investigation of their fitness to run a company again. British industry is too important to be left in the hands of the likes of the shysters at the top of Carillion.”

Jo Faragher

Jo Faragher has been an employment and business journalist for 20 years. She regularly contributes to Personnel Today and writes features for a number of national business and membership magazines. Jo is also the author of 'Good Work, Great Technology', published in 2022 by Clink Street Publishing, charting the relationship between effective workplace technology and productive and happy employees. She won the Willis Towers Watson HR journalist of the year award in 2015 and has been highly commended twice.

previous post
World Cup 2018: Six goals for employers
next post
Court of Appeal: Dismissal for behaviour related to disability was discrimination

You may also like

Performance management is broken: how can we rebuild?

11 Jul 2025

Gregg Wallace case: don’t be too hasty to...

11 Jul 2025

‘Replace sick notes with gym’, Streeting tells GPs

11 Jul 2025

Workers with second jobs at an all-time high

11 Jul 2025

How using data can transform return-to-office mandates

11 Jul 2025

Ministers loosen fire and rehire proposals in Employment...

10 Jul 2025

£188k tribunal award for director sacked after cardiac...

10 Jul 2025

It’s no secret – parity in the workplace...

10 Jul 2025

Firms’ salary secrecy means ‘they lose out on...

10 Jul 2025

Court of Appeal rules that Ryanair agency pilot...

9 Jul 2025

  • Empower and engage for the future: A revolution in talent development (webinar) WEBINAR | As organisations strive...Read more
  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+