Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Latest NewsEquality, diversity and inclusionAge discriminationRetirement

Default retirement age review brought forward to 2010

by Kat Baker 13 Jul 2009
by Kat Baker 13 Jul 2009

The government review into the default retirement age of 65 has been brought forward to next year.

At the launch of the ‘Building a society for all ages’ strategy today, the government revealed the review would be brought forward as a response to the country’s changing demographics and the economic environment.

The Department for Work and Pensions had previously said the compulsory retirement age of 65 – which was introduced in 2006 through the Employment Equality Regulation – would be reviewed in 2011.

The minister for pensions and the ageing society, Angela Eagle, said: “It is time to look again at [the default retirement age]. We want to give older people flexible retirement options. The government is responding to the changed economic landscape.

“The different circumstances today – for businesses, and for individuals coming up to retirement – suggest that an earlier review is appropriate. As Britain’s demographics change, it is sensible that we have the debate on what works for business and individuals. The retirement laws need to reflect modern social and economic circumstances.”

Currently, employers can require all staff to retire at 65 regardless of their circumstances. While the majority of people do retire before 65, 1.3 million people still choose to work beyond state pension age, and many would work past 65 if their employer permitted it.

Denise Keating, chief executive of the Employers Forum on Age, said: “We are absolutely delighted that the government has finally listened to reason and taken action to tackle an archaic system that allows the enforced retirement of people simply because of their age.

“In an ageing society and as recession begins to bite, we can no longer afford a culture of early retirement. It is vital that this anomaly in the age discrimination legislation is removed, as it will help deliver the massive cultural shift that is needed to stop people being stereotyped by age.”

Personnel Today has campaigned alongside the Employers Forum on Age for the government to scrap the default retirement age by 2011.

TUC general secretary Brendan Barber added: “We welcome the early review of the default retirement age. It cannot be right that an employer can sack someone simply for being too old.”

Last week, Personnel Today reported the Department for Work and Pensions committee had recommended in a report on the Equality Bill that the clause confirming the default retirement age should be scrapped.

Sign Personnel Today‘s campaign to scrap the default retirement age.

Avatar
Kat Baker

previous post
Swine-flu plans could save your business says CIPD
next post
Mobile learning paper is 10,000th item on OU database

You may also like

Don’t be gloomy over social mobility in the...

24 Jun 2022

Christian awarded £22k following dismissal over religious necklace

24 Jun 2022

Movers and shakers June 2022: Lloyds, Indeed, Zoom...

24 Jun 2022

Gender pensions gap: women’s retirement pot less than...

24 Jun 2022

White-hot recruitment market? William Tincup talks to Oven-Ready...

24 Jun 2022

British Airways employees at Heathrow vote for walkouts

24 Jun 2022

Young people need more guidance over ‘green jobs’

24 Jun 2022

Government to repeal agency workers ban during strikes

23 Jun 2022

Long Covid: what tribunal’s disability ruling means for...

23 Jun 2022

Brexit remains an ‘open wound’ for EU employees...

23 Jun 2022
  • NSPCC revamps its learning strategy with child wellbeing at its heart PROMOTED | The NSPCC’s mission is to prevent abuse and neglect...Read more
  • Diversity versus inclusion: Why the difference matters PROMOTED | It’s possible for an environment to be diverse, but not inclusive...Read more
  • Five steps for organisations across the globe to become more skills-driven PROMOTED | The shift in the world of work has been felt across the globe...Read more
  • The future of workforce development PROMOTED | Northumbria University and partners share insight...Read more
  • Strathclyde Business School expands its Degree Apprenticeship offer in England PROMOTED | The University of Strathclyde is expanding its programmes...Read more
  • The Search for Talent: Six Major Employer Pitfalls PROMOTED | The Great Resignation continues unabated...Read more
  • Navigating the widening “Skills Confidence Gap” in 2022, and beyond PROMOTED | Cornerstone OnDemand conducted a global study...Read more
  • Apprenticeships are the solution to your recruitment problems PROMOTED | Apprenticeships have the pulling power...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+