The government should delay next month’s rise in the national living wage in order to protect jobs in the midst of the coronavirus crisis, a think-tank has urged.
The Institute for Fiscal Studies has questioned whether the planned increase in the statutory minimum hourly rate to £8.72 from 1 April “still makes sense”.
Annual wage increase
“That decision was based on a recommendation made back in October when the labour market looked utterly different,” said Tom Waters, an IFS researcher. “If the absolute focus is on keeping people in paid work and attached to their employers, delaying next month’s rise in the NLW could be a sensible move.”
The rate is set by the Low Pay Commission, which recommended an above-inflation increase of 5% last October.
Waters said the temporary measures recently introduced by the government to support employers and workers during the pandemic were “well justified in the current climate”, and as such there was a clear case for deferring the timetabled wage increases.
“The big worry right now of course is keeping people in employment as demand for labour dries up,” he said. “In that context the substantial increases in benefits – for example in Universal Credit and in Housing Benefit – announced last week are clearly an appropriate response as the government tries to protect people’s incomes.
“Whether the planned increase in the national living wage to £8.72 an hour as from the start of April still makes sense is open to question.”
The IFS illustrated how the past five years have seen significant cuts to in-work benefits but increases in minimum wages. However, it points out how wage rises took place at a time when UK employment was “high and rising”.
It has urged the government to consult the Low Pay Commission on the upcoming rise, potentially even looking at a temporary cut in the minimum wage rate to mirror the temporary increase in benefits.
“The onset of the crisis probably strengthens the case for raising welfare benefits, and weakens the case for raising minimum wages,” said Waters. “So far, the government has done the former.”
2 comments
This all makes financial sense, however, it is the people on the lowest wages i.e. minimum wage that are working in many of the frontline jobs. Those that are continuing to work on the lowest wage whilst others are furloughed on 80% for sitting at home, and are most likely to feel disgruntled. If you then take away the pay increase they have been waiting for, it is a kick in the teeth for them. Delay the increase for anyone furloughed, but give the increase to those working in my opinion. As the furloughed workers have to go through the HMRC portal it should be easy to separate.
It’s going ahead the government have rejected the advice thank god