Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Equality, diversity and inclusionReligious discrimination

Devil in the detail

by Personnel Today 1 Feb 2005
by Personnel Today 1 Feb 2005

A major complaint against the current legislation that prohibits discrimination in employment or training on the grounds of religion or belief has been that it fails to explain precisely what is meant by religion or religious belief.

Some religious groups believe that the legislation doesn’t go far enough in protecting them against discrimination, but Conservative MP Ann Widdecombe clearly believes the Royal Navy has gone too far as an equal opportunity employer in officially recognising 24-year-old Chris Cranmer as a Satanist.

By recognising Cranmer and his beliefs, the Navy is allowing him to perform Satanic rituals aboard the HMS Cumberland where he serves. The Navy has given him space on board the ship to perform Satanic rituals. If killed in action, Cranmer, as a result of being a registered Satanist, can have a Satanist funeral.

Widdecombe told ITN News: “What they [sailors] believe and do in their own home is one thing, what they do at work is the business of their employer.” She seems to be missing the point of the Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003.

The regulations make it the employer’s business to not discriminate against employees on the basis of religion or belief. Particularly while a ship is at sea, it would likely be hard to make a successful legal case that Cranmer had not been discriminated against if he was not allowed to practice his beliefs and followers of more mainstream beliefs were granted that right.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

As long as Cranmer’s rituals don’t promote hatred or involve violating the human rights of another, the Navy is fulfilling not only the letter, but the spirit of the law.

All organisations should, therefore, follow the sensible example set by the Navy, or else risk a court case.


Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Rising house prices make compulsory pension saving impractical
next post
CIPD hopes new document will raise its profile

You may also like

Decision to sack man for Michael Jackson noises...

29 Aug 2025

EHRC acts on policies flouting law on single-sex...

28 Aug 2025

Data bias means gender pay gap wider than...

26 Aug 2025

Council defends suggested alternatives to ‘husband’ and ‘wife’

21 Aug 2025

British Transport Police first force to hire part-time...

19 Aug 2025

Eurostar’s Georgie Willis a keynote speaker at Employee...

19 Aug 2025

Worker awarded £3,000 for ‘Slave’ graffiti employer had...

7 Aug 2025

Prison officer wins unfair dismissal and harassment case...

1 Aug 2025

Civil Service launches drive to attract interns from...

1 Aug 2025

Federal employees urged to express religious beliefs at...

30 Jul 2025

  • Work smart – stay well: Avoid unnecessary pain with centred ergonomics SPONSORED | If you often notice...Read more
  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise