Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

PoliceLatest NewsDisciplineDiscipline and grievancesTraining delivery

Police officer ‘forcibly’ removed trainees’ earrings

by Ashleigh Webber 19 Apr 2024
by Ashleigh Webber 19 Apr 2024 Don Fritz / Shutterstock.com
Don Fritz / Shutterstock.com

A Dorset police instructor who used a snipping tool to ‘forcibly’ remove earrings worn by three trainee officers ahead of a fitness test has been found guilty of gross misconduct.

PC Martin Briggs is claimed to have ordered the trainee officers to place their heads on a jacket on a desk to have their stud earrings removed after they said they were unable to take out the jewellery.

Briggs was overseeing a “beep test”, where recruits are required to run up and down the length of a sports hall before they hear a beep sound. He insisted that all jewellery must be removed for the test.

Police misconduct

One in five employers facing protracted disciplinary processes

Met Police dismisses 100 officers in a year for gross misconduct

Gross misconduct: is dismissal always the right penalty?

The three officers – PC Georgia Hedditch, PC Elizabeth Christie and PC Holly Law – told a misconduct hearing that they felt “distressed and embarrassed” by the incident, but complied with Briggs’ order because they were concerned about their career prospects if they did not complete the test.

The disciplinary hearing found on Friday (19 April) that Briggs had breached the standards of professional behaviour relating to authority, respect and courtesy, and discreditable conduct, and was guilty of gross misconduct.

The three student officers told the panel that Briggs had used large bolt croppers to remove the piercings, but both Briggs and another officer, PC Davies, said that smaller snippers were used to remove the piercings, and were under the impression the three women had given their consent.

The panel found that while the large bolt croppers could not physically have been used, Briggs took them into the room with him with the intention of the students believing they were to be used

The panel found that the students had not given free and genuine consent but had submitted to his actions.

Deputy Chief Constable Rachel Farrell said: “I was saddened to hear about this incident involving the very team of officers who are expected to demonstrate impeccable standards of behaviour and respect to our new student officers as they begin their policing journey with us.

“Their actions on that day fell below the standards expected of anyone working within Dorset Police and the outcomes delivered by the panel reflect the seriousness of this.

“The panel found that there was confusion over the dress code policy for officers taking part in the job-related fitness test and, since this incident, we have already reviewed our policies and training joining instructions so it is made very clear to officers that no jewellery or piercings must be worn.

“Tackling unethical or unacceptable behaviour remains a force priority and I would encourage members of the public to report them to the force so they can be thoroughly investigated.”

Mark Ley-Morgan, a barrister representing Dorset Police, said: “Three very junior officers came into an office, putting their head on a table, having their earrings forcibly cut out. It is a serious incident which should never have happened and it is astonishing that it did. What would a member of the public thinking of joining the police service make of this?”

Briggs said he made a “highly regrettable error of judgment” and argued that he removed the jewellery with the trainees’ consent.

Hedditch told the disciplinary panel that she had only been an officer for three weeks at the time of the incident. When she found she could not remove one of her earrings, she jokingly suggested Briggs would have to “cut them out”.

She said: “I didn’t think that it would actually be actioned … In hindsight, it should never have happened.”

Christie said: “He was holding these really long bolt cutters in his hands and was opening and closing them. He said: ‘Who’s next?’ I remember staring at them and thinking: ‘Shit; they are big.’

“It was overwhelming. I was shaking with adrenaline and trying not to cry.”

British Transport Police recently scrapped its annual beep test for existing officers because of concerns it indirectly discriminated against women.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This story was originally published on 17 April and updated on 19 April following the decision of the disciplinary panel.

Latest HR job opportunities on Personnel Today


Browse more human resources jobs

Ashleigh Webber

Ashleigh is a former editor of OHW+ and former HR and wellbeing editor at Personnel Today. Ashleigh's areas of interest include employee health and wellbeing, equality and inclusion and skills development. She has hosted many webinars for Personnel Today, on topics including employee retention, financial wellbeing and menopause support.

previous post
Stop-smoking support should be offered alongside lung cancer screening
next post
Free childcare plans: 40,000 extra staff needed by September 2025

You may also like

‘Polygamous working’ is a minefield for HR

14 May 2025

Firearms officers to be granted anonymity

25 Apr 2025

Top 10 HR questions March 2025: Carrying over...

2 Apr 2025

’Task masking’ – the trend you didn’t need...

21 Mar 2025

Former BNP Paribas lawyer fined for using offensive...

6 Mar 2025

Nurse at centre of trans tribunal faces conduct...

17 Feb 2025

Met Police cannot dismiss by vetting withdrawal

11 Feb 2025

Top 10 HR questions January 2025: TUPE employee...

4 Feb 2025

Culture in the City: the FCA non-financial misconduct...

30 Oct 2024

Post Office CPO was asked to ‘close down’...

10 Oct 2024

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+