Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Latest News

Employers against proposals to raise retirement age

by Personnel Today 16 Aug 2004
by Personnel Today 16 Aug 2004

Almost
all employers disagree with proposals to raise the age of retirement from 65 to
70, according to a new survey.

The
survey of HR professionals by Croner consultants found 85 per cent of those
polled disagree with the CBI’s recent recommendation to raise the retirement
age by 2030.

However,
this does not necessarily signify a general reluctance to employ older workers,
with 92 per cent of respondents saying they believe there are benefits to
having an increasingly mature workforce in the UK.

New
age discrimination legislation will be introduced in 2006, which will provide
extra protection to older workers by making it unlawful to dismiss an employee
because of their age.

Richard
Smith, HR expert at Croner, said employers must not assume that 65 is the
‘default’ retirement age as there may be organisations where the normal
retirement age is higher or lower.

“Even
though age discrimination legislation is not yet in force, employers cannot
simply dismiss employees when they reach ‘retirement age’, unless it is clearly
stated in an employee’s contract that this is expected,” he said.

"The
employee could still claim unfair dismissal and seek compensation – for
example, under the Disability Discrimination Act – if they are unreasonably
dismissed for being no longer thought to be capable of doing their job,” Smith
said. “From 1 October, prior to enforcing retirement, the employer will need to
call a meeting explaining their intentions and allow an appeal against a
compulsory retirement decision."

To
avoid dismissing older employees unfairly, Croner advises:

·
Don’t assume that employees expect to retire at 65. Many wish to continue to
work beyond this age

·
Look at the benefits older workers can bring in terms of skills, experience,
attendance levels and maturity

·
More mature employees may be less prone to ‘job hop’, reducing costs of
retention and replacement

·
Even if a number of redundancies are being made, age may not be a fair criteria
to adopt for selection, although consideration for selection should be given to
those who are past retirement age

·
If it is felt that the employee is no longer capable of their work due to
deteriorating health, ask them for a medical report and consider any reasonable
adjustments that could be made to their current job to allow them to continue
employment. If no adjustments can be made, alternative work or part-time work
should be also considered

·
Update all contracts of employment with the company policy on retirement, which
should include the age at which they will be expected to retire.

By Michael Millar

Personnel Today
Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
MoD launches consultation on pay for reservists and employers
next post
Investment in people top priority as skills shortage worsens

You may also like

Are you a ‘quiet quitter’?

12 Aug 2022

July saw highest number of job adverts for...

12 Aug 2022

Transport sector recruitment ‘should be overhauled to improve...

12 Aug 2022

Liz Truss comments on Civil Service dismissed as...

12 Aug 2022

Hot summers, hot desks – employment law advice...

12 Aug 2022

Sharp rise in firms offering enhanced parental leave...

11 Aug 2022

Working in a heatwave: what should employers consider?

11 Aug 2022

Zero-hours contract benefits ‘can outweigh negatives for workers’

11 Aug 2022

Nearly 14,000 whistleblowing reports of furlough fraud received...

11 Aug 2022

Skills passport and new qualifications for care workers...

11 Aug 2022
  • 6 reasons why work-based learning is better than traditional training PROMOTED | A recent Fortune/Deloitte survey found that 71% of CEOs are anticipating that this year’s biggest business disrupter...Read more
  • Strengthening Scotland’s public services through virtual recruiting PROMOTED | This website is Scotland's go-to place for job seekers looking to apply for roles in public services...Read more
  • What’s next for L&D? Enter Alchemist… PROMOTED | It’s time to turn off the tedious and get ready for interactive and immersive learning experiences...Read more
  • Simple mistakes are blighting the onboarding experience PROMOTED | The onboarding of new hires is a company’s best chance...Read more
  • Preventing Burnout: How can HR help key workers get the right help? PROMOTED | Workplace wellbeing may seem a distant memory...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+