Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Confidentiality

Employers should not count on confidentiality

by Personnel Today 28 May 2002
by Personnel Today 28 May 2002

EAT rules employment tribunals must exercise discretion when employers
claim confidential material cannot be presented. By Alison Hollingsworth,
associate in the Employment Rights and Benefits Group at Bristows

This article looks at two interesting EAT decisions relating to orders for
disclosure in employment tribunal proceedings.

Asda Stores Ltd v Thomson and others, 2002, IRLR 245, concerned unfair
dismissal claims by three Asda managers dismissed as a result of allegations
involving their use and supply of illegal drugs at company events. Asda carried
out an investigation into the allegations and took statements in confidence
from a number of employees.

The statements were never shown to the managers. At the end of the
investigation, Asda concluded that the allegations were well founded and the
managers were summarily dismissed.

In the employment tribunal, the managers made an application for disclosure
of the statements. Asda resisted the application on the grounds that a promise
of confidentiality had been given to those who made the statements and
disclosure would breach that promise. The reason that promise was made was
because of fear of reprisals; disclosure of the statements and identity of
witnesses were not necessary for a fair disposal of the claims.

The tribunal found the statements were relevant documents and necessary for
the fair disposal of the case and ordered them to be disclosed in totality.

The EAT held the employment tribunal could have directed disclosure of
documents in an anonymous or redrafted form. The tribunal could have done so by
ordering that the identity of the witnesses be concealed, thus maintaining the
promise of confidentiality to those witnesses.

The EAT considered Asda had acted perfectly properly in offering
confidentiality, particularly where hard drugs were allegedly involved. The EAT
added, however, that if it was not possible to conceal the identity of a
witness other than by excluding a statement in its entirety, then this is what
the tribunal must do.

In Knight v Department of Social Security, 2002, IRLR 249, Mr Knight, a
disabled person, applied for an administrative post. In common with other
disabled candidates, he had to sit an exam, which, if passed, would lead to an
interview. He was initially informed that he had passed the test but later he
received a second letter saying he had in fact failed. Knight subsequently
lodged a disability discrimination claim, alleging his test papers had been
altered. In order to prepare his case, he requested disclosure of his original
test papers as marked, the original test answer papers of the successful
candidates, the original test questions taken by all disabled candidates and
the application forms of the successful candidates.

The employment tribunal ord-ered disclosure should be made of all the items,
but only to the tribunal itself, not to Knight or his representatives. Knight
appealed, extending his disclosure request to a set of model answers to the
test as well.

The EAT held that all the documents requested by Knight were relevant and
that no restriction on the use of these documents could be justified, save
where the personal details of the other candidates were concerned. In
particular, the EAT said that it could not accept the DSS’ argument that if the
test questions entered the public domain it might be put to the considerable
cost (£150,000- £200,000) of setting another test.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Key points

● Confidentiality per se is not a reason for refusing disclosure
● In appropriate cases, a document may have to be excluded where the
identity of an employee cannot be concealed
● Wide disclosure may be grant-ed in discrimination cases where documents
are relevant to the applicant’s complaint.
● Alison Hollingsworth is an associate in the Employment Rights and
Benefits Group at Bristows

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
DTI publishes official bank and public holiday list
next post
Vocational engineering courses ‘needs resourcing’

You may also like

NatWest blocks messaging apps for work communications

13 Nov 2024

Government rejects ban of NDAs in sexual harassment...

15 May 2024

What are the lessons for business from the...

26 Apr 2024

HSBC Holdings employees under scrutiny for WhatsApp use

23 Feb 2022

Pregnant employee awarded £10k after colleague accessed patient...

3 Sep 2021

Coronavirus: What employers need to know (webinar)

19 Mar 2020

Prevent use of NDAs for discrimination and harassment...

11 Jun 2019

Nine steps to complying with the 2018 trade...

29 Oct 2018

Morrisons data breach: Could the supermarket have done...

24 Oct 2018

Morrisons payroll data breach judgment a ‘wake-up call’...

22 Oct 2018

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+