Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Employment law clinic No 1 Garden leave

by Personnel Today 13 Mar 2001
by Personnel Today 13 Mar 2001

The
challenge: A company has lost confidence in a senior manager. It needs to
decide whether to put him on garden leave or pay him off. There is a pay in
lieu of notice (Pilon) clause which allows the employer to pay salary in lieu in
full and final settlement of all claims. There is also a garden leave clause
and restrictive covenants. Elaine Aarons & Robbie Gilbert weigh up the
issues

Legal  issues

 Both options being considered involve a
dismissal.  Most garden leave clauses
only apply when notice has been given. Equally, paying the manager off will
involve a dismissal. Although the Pilon clause is stated to be in full and
final settlement of all claims this will not prevent him bringing an unfair
dismissal claim.

–
The company therefore needs to decide whether it is prepared to accept the risk
of having to pay off any unfair dismissal claim. If not, unless there are
grounds for summary dismissal it is not advisable for the company to proceed
with either option.

–
The choice for the company between garden leave and paying in lieu involves
balancing the cost. The Pilon permits the company to pay salary alone. In
contrast, during garden leave the employee will be entitled to salary and all
contractual benefits. A close examination of any discretionary bonuses which
become payable during the garden leave period will be needed (particularly
given recent case law) in order to see whether they are included within
contractual benefits. The same is true of share options and any other "discretionary"
benefits. At the end of the garden leave period the manager may be able to
claim bonus for the year in which dismissal occurs.

–
Having said this, if payment is made in lieu, the company will only have the
protection of the restrictive covenants. Garden leave clauses are often easier
to enforce than covenants. In order to decide if it is an option only to rely
on the covenants, the covenants need to be read very carefully to decide how
enforceable they are.

–
Moreover, unless the period of the covenants is reduced by the period of garden
leave served, the company would inevitably have a shorter period of restriction
if it relies on the covenants alone as compared to having the benefit of garden
leave as well.

–
Even if placed on garden leave, there is no guarantee that while "at
home" the manager will not be in touch with "his" clients. 

–
The company can probably summarily dismiss and not pay under the Pilon but this
is unlikely to be attractive. No post-termination restrictions will apply.
Damages for breach of contract will be payable but it is unlikely these will be
less than the sum payable under the Pilon. It depends on how much he could
claim in respect of bonus for the part of the year worked and the notice
period, and how quickly he will find alternative employment.

HR
issues

–
Garden leave clauses are increasingly common in employment contracts.They do
not so much replace restrictive covenants as reinforce them.

–
One of the biggest advantages of the garden leave arrangement is that the employer
holds the purse strings while the leave continues. This does not give the
employer absolute control over the individual’s activities but in hard
practical terms it has a better chance of protecting its interests than if it
relies on restrictive covenants alone.

–
No stigma is attached to putting someone on garden leave and so it should not
damage future job prospects to impose garden leave on the person concerned
(except to the extent a competitor is only interested in the employee for his
contacts or confidential information which is precisely what the garden leave
is to guard against).

–
The company needs to decide how commercially valuable the manager’s contacts
are in order to decide whether to impose garden leave. Garden leave is clearly
the more costly option and therefore needs to be worthwhile. Not only are there
the costs of salary and benefits but there are also potential legal costs and
lost management time. If the employer has to resort to litigation to enforce
the garden leave period this becomes all the more acute.

–
The value of keeping the employee on garden leave should be reviewed regularly
particularly where a long notice period is involved.  Often the time taken to secure the employee’s contacts is shorter
than originally anticipated.

–
Even if it is decided to pay in lieu of notice negotiations will have to be
conducted with a view to reaching a suitable compromise agreement to prevent an
unfair dismissal claim. The company may want to enforce a period of garden
leave even though the ultimate intention is to pay the employee off.

–
When meeting the employee to inform him he is to be given notice and put on
garden leave or paid off, have two people present on behalf of the employer so
that one can act as a witness for the other. It is recommended that the
individual is given a letter setting out the proposed course of action to avoid
any confusion.

–
Plan the communications exercise in advance. 
It is important to explain the position to employees and customers.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

–
Also, plan the process by which the company is to retain work that would
otherwise be lost to a competitor.

By
Elaine Aarons, partner, and Robbie Gilbert, HR consultant, Eversheds

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Are you a young turk or old fogey?
next post
Telecoms firms suffer from HR weaknesses

You may also like

Forward features list 2025 – submitting content to...

23 Nov 2024

Features list 2021 – submitting content to Personnel...

1 Sep 2020

Large firms have no plans to bring all...

26 Aug 2020

A typical work-from-home lunch: crisps

24 Aug 2020

Occupational health on the coronavirus frontline – ‘I...

21 Aug 2020

Occupational Health & Wellbeing research round-up: August 2020

7 Aug 2020

Acas: Redundancy related enquiries surge 160%

5 Aug 2020

Coronavirus: lockdown ‘phase two’ may bring added headaches...

17 Jul 2020

Unemployment to top 4 million as workers come...

15 Jul 2020

Over 1,000 UK redundancies expected at G4S Cash...

14 Jul 2020

  • Preparing for a new era of workforce planning (webinar) WEBINAR | Employers now face...Read more
  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+