Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Legal sectorLatest NewsDisciplineDiscipline and grievancesDismissal

Employment tribunals have ‘almost ground to a halt’

by Adam McCulloch 9 Nov 2020
by Adam McCulloch 9 Nov 2020 Photo: Robert B. Fishman/DPA/PA Images
Photo: Robert B. Fishman/DPA/PA Images

Employment tribunal cases are having to wait 14 months before receiving a court hearing with recently launched cases not being heard before December 2021.

Research by employment law firm GQ|Littler published today (9 November) revealed that Southampton was listing court hearings for two-week complex discrimination cases in August 2021, and Bristol for April 2021. London South employment tribunal was not listing hearings until December 2021.

GQ|Littler also found that a two-day ordinary unfair dismissal claim would not be heard by London South tribunal until March 2021 (April, in Bristol; May in Southampton; and January in Exeter).

High workloads and a shortage of staff at the London Central employment tribunal had also resulted in telephone hold times now stretching for up to five hours for those calling to discuss the scheduling of hearings.

Employment tribunals

More employment tribunals to go virtual in raft of changes

Increase tribunal time limit to six months, say lawyers

Matthew Taylor: Covid-19 increases temptation of non-compliance

What impact would the return of tribunal fees have?

The delays between employment tribunals receiving claims and then listing them for a hearing was a reflection of the pressure being placed on tribunal resources, the law firm said. Many tribunals were working through large backlogs of claims that had steadily built up since tribunal fees were abolished in 2017, it added.

With uncertainty over the outcome of a claim being stretched for so long, employers were likely to face risks such as senior management being distracted from other pressing issues and prolonged reputational damage for businesses as grievances circulate without being resolved. For employees, financial hardship was likely to result, said the firm, because they were probably depending on a tribunal award to pay their bills.

Raoul Parekh, partner at GQ|Littler, said: “With delays stretching up to 14 months the employment tribunal system has almost ground to a halt.”

He added that the years of underfunding that had afflicted the judicial system was partly responsible: “This has created a huge backlog as employment tribunals have limited capacity to manage the caseload. This has been worsened by Covid, with schedules being pushed even further back.”

Parekh said the pandemic had given rise to a whole host of new employment law issues. “With a spike in tribunal cases widely anticipated, the problem is only likely to get worse before it gets better.”

GQ|Littler proposed allowing non-employment judges to take on cases and extending Acas early conciliation periods to increase the chance of settlement as partial solutions.

There should also be measures to reduce the administrative tasks that judges have to complete.

In September the government announced it was relaxing the rules around employment tribunals to allow more hearings to be held online as part of a £80m package that would see more staff recruited.

Parekh acknowledged the measures but said they wouldn’t provide a solution.

“The new measures proposed by the government are welcomed by many in the legal profession. However, they only scratch the surface, addressing the consequences of the problem and not the cause – a lack of resources.”

“Delays at tribunals can trigger a downward spiral – they often create more friction between employees and employers and in turn drag out claims even further.”

Latest HR job opportunities on Personnel Today

Browse more human resources jobs

 

Adam McCulloch
Adam McCulloch

Adam McCulloch is a freelance writer and production editor who has worked in sectors including travel (The Guardian), aviation (Flight International), agriculture (Farmers' Weekly), music (Jazzwise), theatre (The Stage) and social work (Community Care). He also works for a national newspaper and is the author of KentWalksNearLondon

previous post
California votes to preserve Uber and Lyft drivers’ gig status
next post
Nearly half of adults suffering mentally because of poor sleep

2 comments

Avatar
Stephen Levinson 14 Dec 2020 - 3:01 pm

The obvious answer to these delays, if the parties can be encouraged to agree, is to mediate.

Even employers who have reason to wish the case may just go away will, in many circumstances, see the sense in getting these time consuming and distracting divergences from their core business resolved sooner, rather than festering and becoming more expensive to manage over time

Reply
Avatar
M 26 Mar 2021 - 3:12 pm

Central office in Leicester know the problem with London central employment tribunal but still send claims there, when there are other tribunal in London.

Reply

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

You may also like

Law protecting frontline workers against violence takes effect

28 Jun 2022

Postal workers and doctors threaten strikes over pay

28 Jun 2022

Attracting diverse young talent to the ‘secret’ world...

28 Jun 2022

Four-day week: what are the legal considerations for...

28 Jun 2022

Hire quality vs speed: Finding the perfect balance...

28 Jun 2022

Gender pay gap ‘won’t close until 2151’

27 Jun 2022

Third of employees living ‘payday to payday’

27 Jun 2022

PwC to award inflation-busting pay increase

27 Jun 2022

Barristers walk out in protest over fees

27 Jun 2022

Roe v Wade: US employers rally to support...

27 Jun 2022
  • NSPCC revamps its learning strategy with child wellbeing at its heart PROMOTED | The NSPCC’s mission is to prevent abuse and neglect...Read more
  • Diversity versus inclusion: Why the difference matters PROMOTED | It’s possible for an environment to be diverse, but not inclusive...Read more
  • Five steps for organisations across the globe to become more skills-driven PROMOTED | The shift in the world of work has been felt across the globe...Read more
  • The future of workforce development PROMOTED | Northumbria University and partners share insight...Read more
  • Strathclyde Business School expands its Degree Apprenticeship offer in England PROMOTED | The University of Strathclyde is expanding its programmes...Read more
  • The Search for Talent: Six Major Employer Pitfalls PROMOTED | The Great Resignation continues unabated...Read more
  • Navigating the widening “Skills Confidence Gap” in 2022, and beyond PROMOTED | Cornerstone OnDemand conducted a global study...Read more
  • Apprenticeships are the solution to your recruitment problems PROMOTED | Apprenticeships have the pulling power...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+