Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Employment lawEquality, diversity and inclusion

Equality Bill amendment bans wedding rings from workplace to protect divorcees

by Louisa Peacock 1 Apr 2010
by Louisa Peacock 1 Apr 2010

Workers will be forced to remove their wedding rings while at work after a shock amendment to the Equality Bill late last night warned employees going through a divorce would feel discriminated against.

PLEASE NOTE: This article was published on April Fool’s Day 2010.

Ministers from the three main political parties backed an amendment in the House of Commons to make employers ban wedding and engagement rings from the workplace, after the European Parliament ruled that divorcees should be afforded the same protection as religious groups.

It follows advice from the equality watchdog earlier this month that vegans and atheists should be protected under equality law.

A new equality code of practice states: “A belief need not include faith or worship of a god or gods, but must affect how a person lives their life or perceives the world.”

Ministers in parliament last night claimed that those who have experienced, or were going through divorce, did so because it was indeed a belief about how a person lives their life, and that anything that supports marriage could be seen as anti-discriminatory to that belief.

One said: “People going through divorce do so because they believe marriage is no longer an option for them. It is their right to believe that they are not suited to the life of marriage after all, and seeing other people’s wedding rings at work or elsewhere is a constant reminder to them that their belief is undermined.”

He added: “Employers must have a duty to ensure that workers do not feel discriminated against at work. Asking colleagues to remove wedding rings is the most simple and cost-effective way of ensuring equality.”

Under the proposals, workers will also be told not to discuss marriage proposals or arrangements at work for fear of upsetting divorcees.

The last-minute amendment immediately attracted controversy from the HR profession, who are already left baffled about what does and does not constitute as a protected belief under the new Bill.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

One leading HR director said: “Banning wedding rings from the workplace has gone too far. Where will it stop? Politicians need to stop interfering in employment law.”

The amendment will be discussed again next week by the House of Lords. Click here for more details.

Louisa Peacock

previous post
Health and politics: news analysis
next post
BBC reward director apologises for ‘deliberately disguising’ top earners from public

You may also like

Employers’ duty of care: keeping workers safe in...

27 Jun 2025

Progressive DEI policy is a red line for...

27 Jun 2025

When will the Employment Rights Bill become law?

26 Jun 2025

Seven ways to prepare now for the Employment...

20 Jun 2025

BBC Breakfast bullying and misconduct allegations under investigation

20 Jun 2025

Finance professionals expect less emphasis on ESG and...

18 Jun 2025

Lack of role models a ‘barrier’ for people...

17 Jun 2025

Pride 2025: why corporate allyship still matters

16 Jun 2025

The employer strikes back: the rise of ‘quiet...

13 Jun 2025

HR is second ‘most sexist profession’ survey suggests

13 Jun 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+