Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Recruitment & retentionPre-employment screeningSocial media

Facebook snooping on candidates? GDPR could put a stop to that

by Ed Stacey 27 Jul 2017
by Ed Stacey 27 Jul 2017

Employers who snoop on potential job candidates on social media could soon be breaking the law under GDPR. Ed Stacey, head of employment at PwC Legal, looks at the potential risks of screening future employees in this way.

Guidelines published earlier this month by EU data protection agencies have proposed that employers should have a legal justification before checking the social media accounts of their current or prospective employees.

GDPR resources

How to start preparing for GDPR

Establish a GDPR compliance timeline

Webinar: Get ready for the GDPR

In particular, they have suggested that such checking should be necessary and relevant to the performance of the employee’s job.

While this is not currently required under UK or general EU law, these guidelines are likely to be used in the interpretation of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) that comes into force next year.

Checking up

According to a number of surveys, the majority of employers in the UK admit to reviewing social media accounts of prospective employees and it is likely that these surveys actually underestimate its prevalence.

So, why do employers choose to undertake these social media checks? For many it is to ensure that there is no online evidence of past criminal behaviour, drug taking or other illicit activities.

However, where should employers draw the line? Many people will have photos of themselves in their social media accounts drinking and partying with friends.

The question is whether this is relevant to the role that they will be undertaking. Some employers might argue that it displays a lack of judgement when the individual could have chosen to keep these photos on a private rather than public setting.

The person making the judgments about the social activities of prospective employees should also be careful to avoid imposing their own personal social code that may be significantly more conservative than average.

Doing so puts the employer at risk of a lack of diversity in the people that it employs.

Legal risks and restrictions

As explained above, there is no legal restriction on reviewing an applicant’s social media accounts but there are some legal risks in doing so.

If an applicant is rejected and they subsequently learn that their account has been reviewed prior to that rejection, it may give the candidate the ability to argue that the reason for their rejection was on discriminatory grounds.

For example, their social media account may have made it clear that they were gay, that they followed a particular religion or were planning a family. Even where the employer’s decision was not based on any such factor, it creates a risk for the prospective employer.

Given that younger people will be more likely to have social media accounts than older people, it also presents a risk of the review being indirectly discriminatory on grounds of age.

Where the employer can point to a specific reason why they need to undertake the review that would objectively justify doing so then they would be able to defeat such claim but, again, it is placing the employer at heightened risk.

Fair access to candidates

Acas has issued guidance on the use of social media in recruitment which says that employers should consider how they will reach the pool of candidates not using social media; whether it is fair to assess candidates differently depending on whether they have an accessible online profile; and whether using social media to target low skilled workers will be successful given that they may not use this media in their roles.

So having a single policy in relation to social media checking across all vacancies in the organisation may be inappropriate in any event.

Finally, can the use of social media lead to mistakes creeping into the recruitment process? It is probably fair to say that less rigour is generally applied in verifying what is said online than in checking a written CV.

In terms of the position for current employees, there may be contractual provisions that specifically allow employers to review the social media accounts of their employees.

With or without such provisions, employers must ensure that the company brand is not being damaged by employees, for example if they are publicly criticising customers.

They may also want to protect against the risks of cyber bullying between colleagues. Some companies will also check their employees’ social media accounts when they have taken sick leave to check the validity of that.

Exit strategy

A final area for consideration is when employees are leaving an employer.

Many employers will review their social media accounts (again particularly those used for business purposes such as LinkedIn) to ascertain if they are undertaking any activities before or after their departure that may place them in breach of their contractual obligations, for example not to target customers.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

There may be no current plans to make the scrutiny of social media accounts unlawful, but it is clear from the guidelines and the underlying risks that employers are best advised to carefully consider the justifications for reviewing the social media accounts of both prospective and current employees.

While there are clearly some legitimate reasons to do so, employers should do this while fully aware of the risks this could present.

Ed Stacey

Ed Stacey is head of employment at PwC Legal.

previous post
Government asks committee to look into post-Brexit immigration
next post
Six important employment law cases in 2017

You may also like

How to employ a global workforce from the...

28 Aug 2025

Indeed launches platform aimed at healthcare workers

27 Aug 2025

Jobs market continued to struggle during July

26 Aug 2025

Petition calls for rethink on NHS agency staff...

19 Aug 2025

British Transport Police first force to hire part-time...

19 Aug 2025

Just a sixth of employers proactively hire ex-offenders

12 Aug 2025

Young people still confident of landing jobs, despite...

12 Aug 2025

Call for more support for young workers, as...

12 Aug 2025

Nurse and midwife ‘graduate guarantee’ launched

11 Aug 2025

Doctors call for training reform to beat burnout

8 Aug 2025

  • Work smart – stay well: Avoid unnecessary pain with centred ergonomics SPONSORED | If you often notice...Read more
  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise