Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Latest News

Firms risk tribunal claims following age bias ruling

by Personnel Today 17 Sep 2002
by Personnel Today 17 Sep 2002

The clock is ticking for HR professionals who have just 16 days to review their
policies on retirement if they want to ensure they are not at risk from unfair
dismissal claims from older workers.

This is the message from the Employers Forum on Age, which has warned that an
employment tribunal ruling last month (News, 3 September), giving older workers
the right to claim for unfair dismissal and redundancy will have far-reaching
consequences.

Law firm Charles Russell won the landmark case for unfair dismissal on
behalf of a male worker in his 70s by claiming he had suffered from sex
discrimination because there were more men working beyond 65 than women.

Sam Mercer, campaigns director for the EFA, said the ruling is set to make
automatic retirement of staff on their 65th birthday potentially illegal, well
ahead of 2006 when age discrimination legislation comes into force.

"The ruling may have even wider implications than first assumed, namely
around justifying retirement. Employers have found it difficult to identify any
significant justifications for retirement ages," she said.

Paul Quain, barrister for Charles Russell, said employers without a
retirement age policy were at risk from unfair dismissal claims, as were
employers which had policies that had a greater impact on one sex than the
other.

Employers such as B&Q, Marks & Spencer and Nationwide have already
removed compulsory retirement ages or introduced flexible retirement policies.
Sue O’ Neill, diversity manager for B&Q, which has nearly 2,000 workers
aged over 65, welcomed the ruling.

"Why should people retire if they are not ready to?" she asked.

Andy Bodle, HR director of the National Maritime Museum, which last week
announced it is to axe its retirement age, urged all employers to change their
policies. He said: "It’s best practice. Age is not a health and safety
issue – you can have a 40-year-old who is unfit for work. You have to judge
each case on its merits."

Bodle said the museum replaced its final salary pension with a different
scheme to allow older workers greater flexibility.

Staff can now gain access to their pension at any time between the ages of
50 and 75.

The DTI, which contested the case, has until 3 October to lodge an appeal
against the decision.

www.efa.org.uk

By Ben Willmott

What employers should do to avoid unfair dismissal claims involving ageism

– Review policies on retirement to make sure they don’t have a
greater impact on one sex

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

– Put forward a good business reason
for retiring staff at a particular age where possible

– Ensure performance management
systems can effectively assess performance of older workers

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Hindu temple hosts Met recruitment day
next post
TUPE code will prevent two-tier workforce

You may also like

Decision to sack man for Michael Jackson noises...

29 Aug 2025

P&O Ferries boss who steered 800 sackings steps...

29 Aug 2025

UK large companies’ succession planning is weak –...

29 Aug 2025

Gender bonus bias widens pay gap, says Brightmine

29 Aug 2025

Bankers learn of redundancy in email gaffe asking...

29 Aug 2025

Cabin crew manager with ‘flirty banter’ loses discrimination...

29 Aug 2025

Council clerk sacked after trying to ensure his...

29 Aug 2025

Four-day working week trial in Scotland’s public sector...

29 Aug 2025

Day one rights in the Employment Rights Bill...

28 Aug 2025

EHRC acts on policies flouting law on single-sex...

28 Aug 2025

  • Work smart – stay well: Avoid unnecessary pain with centred ergonomics SPONSORED | If you often notice...Read more
  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise