Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Employment lawHR practiceAgency workers

Government will not amend agency workers regulations

by Rob Moss 19 Oct 2010
by Rob Moss 19 Oct 2010

The Government will not make any changes to the Agency Workers Regulations which come into force next year, despite “considerable sympathy” for arguments against the new rules.

Employment relations minister Edward Davey today said that the Government will not be proceeding with any amendment to the Regulations, but will instead use the next 12 months to develop the “best possible” guidance to help employers comply with their obligations.

Coming into force in October 2011, the Agency Workers Regulations 2010 were conceived after the CBI and TUC, together with the previous Government, brokered a deal whereby agency workers will qualify for “equal treatment” as staff employed directly after 12 weeks in their post. The European Agency Workers Directive (AWD) intended this principle to apply from the first day of employment but did allow member states some flexibility on implementation, including the length of the qualifying period.

Before the general election the then shadow business secretary Jonathan Djanogly indicated that if the Tories were elected, they would review the proposed legislation as they were “very unhappy” about the fact that the proposed 12-week qualifying period was not set out in the AWD, nor was there any consultation from employers, the recruitment industry, or Parliament.

However, in his statement, Davey indicated that the Government’s hands were tied due to the “unique legal situation” of the CBI-TUC deal: “The Government’s ability to make changes to address such matters is constrained by the fact that the Regulations are based to a significant degree on the agreement brokered by the previous administration between the CBI and TUC.”

David Yeandle, head of employment policy at the manufacturers’ organisation EEF, said: “It is disappointing that the Government has not felt able to make some changes which would have made it easier for manufacturers to implement these Regulations. However, industry recognises that, if changes had been made, this could have put at risk the vitally important 12 week qualifying period before equal treatment has to apply.

“This would have been too serious a risk for the Government to take as retaining this key element of these Regulations will help to ensure that agency working remains a key part of the UK’s flexible labour market.”

Kevin Green, chief executive of the Recruitment & Employment Confederation, added: “This was a first big test of the Government’s stated commitment to lightening the load on business and we are disappointed with the outcome. We made a strong case for a review in our discussions with the minister. However, re-opening the regulations was always a long shot and would have required support from the trade unions.”

Recruitment firm Adecco has recently carried out research among UK HR professionals in which 80% of respondents said they had “no idea” what the consequences of non-compliance with the AWR would be, and that almost two-thirds (61%) did not realise the Regulations would come into force in a year’s time.

Further information and guidance is available from XpertHR.

Rob Moss
Rob Moss

Rob Moss is a business journalist with more than 25 years' experience. He has been editor of Personnel Today since 2010. He joined the publication in 2006 as online editor of the award-winning website. Rob specialises in labour market economics, gender diversity and family-friendly working. He has hosted hundreds of webinar and podcasts. Before writing about HR and employment he ran news and feature desks on publications serving the global optical and eyewear market, the UK electrical industry, and energy markets in Asia and the Middle East.

previous post
Employers warned not to force older staff out through performance management after DRA is scrapped
next post
Little room for savings in the public sector, say managers

You may also like

What does it mean to be an HR...

22 Sep 2023

AI in employment: the pitfalls and laws on...

21 Sep 2023

CIPD publishes manifesto for good work

20 Sep 2023

Right to predictable working hours receives Royal Assent

19 Sep 2023

Lloyds of London boss urges greater return to...

7 Sep 2023

Personnel Today Awards 2023 shortlist: Employment Law Firm...

7 Sep 2023

AI taskforce launched to address gaps in law

4 Sep 2023

Strikes Act consultation aims to establish minimum service...

25 Aug 2023

25 years of employment tribunals – a system...

25 Aug 2023

Bank holidays: six things employers need to know

25 Aug 2023

  • Discover the value of CIPD accreditation PROMOTED | See how the CIPD can increase your earning potential...Read more
  • What does it mean to be an HR professional in 2024? (survey) PROMOTED | The world of HR is changing rapidly...Read more
  • The Contractor Management Mastery Pack: Everything you need to manage and pay global contractors PROMOTED | Answers to cross-border...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2023

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2023 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+