Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Employment lawEquality, diversity and inclusionSex discriminationEqual payTUPE

Gutridge and others v Sodexo

by Personnel Today 9 Nov 2009
by Personnel Today 9 Nov 2009

Key points

TUPE preserves the right to bring an equal pay claim after the transfer.

Claims arising from the employment up to the date of the transfer must be brought within six months of the transfer. Transferees’ overall exposure to equal pay claims will therefore decrease six months after the transfer.

What you should do

As ever, it is important for potential transferees to complete proper due diligence prior to a TUPE transfer to determine what claims they could inherit.

The claimants, all female cleaners, transferred by operation of TUPE to Sodexo Limited (Sodexo) under contracting out arrangements on 1 July 2001. They continued to work at Hartlepool General Hospital.

The women brought equal pay proceedings against Sodexo in December 2006 using male maintenance assistants as comparators. The maintenance assistants also worked at Hartlepool General Hospital both before and after 1 July 2001. The employment tribunal found in favour of the claimants.

Sodexo appealed on the grounds that the claims were out of time.

The EAT held that Regulation 5 of TUPE transferred two kinds of liability with respect to the equality clause:

  • liability arising from the employment up to the date of the transfer (under Regulation 5(2)); and
  • liability arising from the employment after the date of the transfer (under Regulation 5(1)).

Any claim under Regulation 5(2) must be brought against the transferee within six months of the transfer whereas the time limit for claims arising post transfer, under Regulation 5(1) must be brought within six months of the new employment ending.

The Court of Appeal upheld the EAT’s decision.

Lord Justice Wall concluded that he could not see why the claimants should have a greater right against the transferee in relation to a Regulation 5(2) liability than they would have had against the transferor. Therefore, it was right that the time limit for enforcing that claim was six months from the transfer.

Personnel Today
Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Dunedin Canmore Housing Association v Donaldson
next post
Cook v MSHK Limited

You may also like

Women at FTSE 100 firms won’t gain equality...

28 Sep 2023

Labour pledges small business menopause guidance

27 Sep 2023

Finance regulator consults on tougher conduct rules

25 Sep 2023

One in four over 50s working part-time

25 Sep 2023

AI in employment: the pitfalls and laws on...

21 Sep 2023

Coalition of firms sets out to boost diversity...

21 Sep 2023

CIPD publishes manifesto for good work

20 Sep 2023

Right to predictable working hours receives Royal Assent

19 Sep 2023

Gender pay gap could take 63 years to...

13 Sep 2023

Union urges Birmingham City Council to settle pay...

8 Sep 2023

  • Discover the value of CIPD accreditation PROMOTED | See how the CIPD can increase your earning potential...Read more
  • What does it mean to be an HR professional in 2024? (survey) PROMOTED | The world of HR is changing rapidly...Read more
  • The Contractor Management Mastery Pack: Everything you need to manage and pay global contractors PROMOTED | Answers to cross-border...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2023

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2023 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+