Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Sexual harassmentEquality, diversity and inclusionLatest NewsEconomics, government & businessTrade unions

House of Lords waters down new sexual harassment laws

by Adam McCulloch 14 Jul 2023
by Adam McCulloch 14 Jul 2023 Photograph: HasanZaidi / Shutterstock.com
Photograph: HasanZaidi / Shutterstock.com

Plans to toughen up workplace sexual harassment laws will be diluted, drawing heavy criticism from the TUC and equality campaigners.

A compromise between the government and Conservative peers today means that the Worker Protection (Amendment of Equality Act 2010) Bill will no longer make employers liable for harassment of their employees by third parties. The duty on employers to prevent sexual harassment will also be weakened.

The Fawcett Society, the Suzy Lamplugh Trust and the TUC had all urged ministers not to backtrack on the new law in May.

Fawcett Society chief executive Jemima Olchawski said at the time: “We need to see a serious commitment from this government to better protect women at work.

Worker Protection Bill

Latest sexual harassment stories

Sexual harassment law: Employers to gain new responsibilities

Half of women in night-time jobs harassed

Sexual harassment protections closer to being enshrined in law

“It’s nothing short of scandalous that some Tory Peers have sought to play politics with a bill which would offer the first significant increase in protections for women since the #MeToo movement. Women deserve and demand better. It’s time for this government to deliver.”

However, the changes have come after Conservative peers’ concerns over free speech and employers being exposed to costly lawsuits, put the Bill’s progress through Parliament at risk.

During the committee stage in the House of Lords, the government accepted the need for compromise in order to ensure the Bill’s passage and indicated the two amendments tabled by Tory peers would be added into the final version.

Communities minister Baroness Scott of Bybrook said: “While the government does believe that it is important workers are protected against this form of harassment, having heard the debate, I recognise that there are strongly held views held by those who have spoken.”

On the second amendment, which weakens the duty on employers to prevent sexual harassment by changing the requirement from taking “all reasonable steps” to simply taking “reasonable steps”, Lady Scott said: “While it could be said that the duty to take reasonable steps is a lower bar than all reasonable steps, it has to be remembered that this will be a new duty which has not existed before.

“And as such, a duty to take reasonable steps is still an improvement for employees in respect of sexual harassment compared to the state status quo.” She confirmed the government would seek to accept the amendments at report stage.

Conservative peer Lord Hannan of Kingsclere, who had tabled the amendment on employer liability for harassment of employees by third parties, said the Bill in its original form went “too far for some of us and not far enough for others, but all sides can at least live with it.”

Tory peer Baroness Noakes, told peers the amendments were not intended to water down the Equality Act, where employers are responsible for the acts of employees in relation to harassment unless they have taken “all” reasonable steps.

She added: “And we have to think about the impact on employers and in particular, small businesses, who struggle to cope with things like that.”

It is disgraceful that they’ve given in to Tory backbenchers and let down working women across the country” – Paul Nowak, TUC

The Bill’s sponsor in the Lords, Liberal Democrat Baroness Burt of Solihull, said she recognised the need for compromise “to retain its core purpose while allowing it to progress”.

However, TUC general secretary Paul Nowak called the acceptance of the amendments “disgraceful”.

“Ministers promised to bring in new laws to tackle sexual harassment at work by customers and patients. It is disgraceful that they’ve given in to Tory backbenchers and let down working women across the country.

“Every day we hear stories about sexual harassment in our workplaces. Many women in front-line jobs – like shop workers and GPs’ receptionists – suffer regular abuse and harassment from patients and customers.

“This new law could have put the onus on employers keep their staff safe from this type of abuse. They have abandoned working people – again.”

Polling published by the TUC in May found that three in five (58%) women – and almost two-thirds (62%) of women aged between 25 and 34 – had experienced sexual harassment, bullying or verbal abuse at work.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

In two out of five (39%) of the most recent incidents, the perpetrator of the sexual harassment, bullying or verbal abuse was a third party rather than another member of staff.

Latest HR job opportunities on Personnel Today


Browse more human resources jobs

Adam McCulloch

Adam McCulloch first worked for Personnel Today magazine in the early 1990s as a sub editor. He rejoined Personnel Today as a writer in 2017, covering all aspects of HR but with a special interest in diversity, social mobility and industrial relations. He has ventured beyond the HR realm to work as a freelance writer and production editor in sectors including travel (The Guardian), aviation (Flight International), agriculture (Farmers' Weekly), music (Jazzwise), theatre (The Stage) and social work (Community Care). He is also the author of KentWalksNearLondon. Adam first became interested in industrial relations after witnessing an exchange between Arthur Scargill and National Coal Board chairman Ian McGregor in 1984, while working as a temp in facilities at the NCB, carrying extra chairs into a conference room!

previous post
NHS dentistry in ‘crisis of access’, warn MPs
next post
Finance sector makes progress on mental health

You may also like

Consultation launched after Supreme Court ‘sex’ ruling

20 May 2025

Ministers urged to outlaw misuse of NDAs

7 May 2025

BBC to ‘act immediately’ on workplace culture review

28 Apr 2025

Eight new equality laws in the pipeline

10 Apr 2025

Philip Green loses human rights case at ECHR

8 Apr 2025

Darlington nurses’ changing room case delayed to October

3 Apr 2025

Woman asked ‘why do you want to work’...

3 Apr 2025

Former minister calls for end to ‘two-tier’ use...

2 Apr 2025

Primark boss resigns after ‘error of judgment’

31 Mar 2025

Sullivan Review shows how ‘sex’ has been purged...

20 Mar 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+