Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Zero hoursEmployment lawLatest NewsEconomics, government & business

Institute of Directors demand reforms to Employment Rights Bill

by Adam McCulloch 6 Jun 2025
by Adam McCulloch 6 Jun 2025 Parliament
Image: Shutterstock
Parliament
Image: Shutterstock

The Institute of Directors has joined the CBI in accusing the government of not properly listening to business over reforms to the Employment Rights Bill, which is currently in the House of Lords.

As the IoD published research showing that more than seven in 10 (72%) business leaders believe that the Bill will have a negative impact on UK economic growth, principal policy advisor at the organisation Alex Hall-Chen, stated: “Government has yet to show that it is listening to the concerns of business about the potential unintended consequences of the Bill as it is currently drafted.

“As the Bill continues its passage through the House of Lords, we are calling for targeted changes to the Bill to restore business confidence in hiring and investment in staff in the UK.”

Last month, CBI chairman Rupert Soames told the annual Acas conference that ministers were failing to listen to business concerns over the proposals.

New research from the Institute of Directors reveals that over seven in 10 (72%) business leaders believe that the Employment Rights Bill will have a negative impact on UK economic growth.

Employment Rights Bill

Facilities firms share ‘deep concerns’ on workers’ rights

Employment Rights Bill: peers propose change to work experience rules

House of Lords to resume scrutiny of Employment Rights Bill

The research also investigated how business leaders planned to respond to the measures in the Bill.

Half (49%) reported that they would be less likely to hire new staff, a third (36%) stated that they would be more likely to outsource roles or operations to other countries, and a quarter (23%) reported that they will be more likely to make redundancies. Slightly over half (52%) of directors also reported that they will be more likely to invest in automation.

Hall-Chen added: “If there is a silver lining, it is that more employers will invest in automation and other measures which may improve the UK’s stagnating productivity levels.”

The Institute would like to see the planned introduction of additional protections against unfair dismissal in the Bill amended so that they only come into effect after six months of employment, rather than on day one.

In terms of zero hours the IoD wants the planned reference period for the entitlement to guaranteed hours to be 52 weeks, and make it a right for employees to request, rather than to be proactively offered, a contract reflecting hours regularly worked.

The directors want one waiting day to be retained before employees can access Statutory Sick Pay and existing thresholds for statutory recognition of trade unions to remain.

 

Latest HR job opportunities on Personnel Today

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.


Browse more human resources jobs

 

Adam McCulloch

Adam McCulloch first worked for Personnel Today magazine in the early 1990s as a sub editor. He rejoined Personnel Today as a writer in 2017, covering all aspects of HR but with a special interest in diversity, social mobility and industrial relations. He has ventured beyond the HR realm to work as a freelance writer and production editor in sectors including travel (The Guardian), aviation (Flight International), agriculture (Farmers' Weekly), music (Jazzwise), theatre (The Stage) and social work (Community Care). He is also the author of KentWalksNearLondon. Adam first became interested in industrial relations after witnessing an exchange between Arthur Scargill and National Coal Board chairman Ian McGregor in 1984, while working as a temp in facilities at the NCB, carrying extra chairs into a conference room!

previous post
ICO strategy to examine use of AI in recruitment tech
next post
US Supreme Court lowers burden of proof for ‘reverse discrimination’

You may also like

House of Lords votes against day-one dismissal rights

18 Jul 2025

Zero-hours employees may have to request guaranteed hours

17 Jul 2025

Trans row nurse cleared of misconduct as tribunal...

16 Jul 2025

Hugh’s Law calls for paid leave for parents...

16 Jul 2025

Ministers loosen fire and rehire proposals in Employment...

10 Jul 2025

Court of Appeal rules that Ryanair agency pilot...

9 Jul 2025

Bereavement leave to extend to miscarriages before 24...

7 Jul 2025

Company director wins £15k after being told to...

4 Jul 2025

How can HR prepare for changes to the...

3 Jul 2025

Government publishes ‘roadmap’ for Employment Rights Bill

2 Jul 2025

  • Empower and engage for the future: A revolution in talent development (webinar) WEBINAR | As organisations strive...Read more
  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+