Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

IR35TaxLatest NewsEmployment contracts

IR35: Government rules out tax and employment status alignment

by Jo Faragher 2 Sep 2022
by Jo Faragher 2 Sep 2022 The government conceded that many organisations struggled with collecting the right information on contractors
Shutterstock
The government conceded that many organisations struggled with collecting the right information on contractors
Shutterstock

The government has published its response to a Public Accounts Committee review of changes made to off-payroll legislation – also known as IR35.

The PAC published its second report on IR35 reforms in May this year, concluding that organisations do not always have the data available to make accurate decisions about whether a worker is inside or outside IR35 for the purposes of tax and national insurance.

Changes to IR35 came into force for the public sector in 2017 and the private sector in 2021. They shift the responsibility for determining a contractor’s employment status for tax purposes onto the organisation, rather than the individual.

The aim is to stamp out “disguised employment”, where businesses use contractors’ services akin to how they work with employees but do not pay the same levels of tax or national insurance.

However, the introduction of the reforms has attracted criticism from employers and contractors alike, with a number of government departments themselves falling foul of the rules.

IR35 legislation

HMRC looking to recoup £1.4bn from businesses’ use of hidden employees 

Public sector employers were underprepared for IR35, report finds 

Webinar: IR35 – what HR needs to know 

HM Revenue & Customs has now issued a response to the concerns raised by the committee, effectively ruling out greater alignment between tax status and employment rights.

In the response, the government states that while it recognises “there could be some benefits to greater alignment between the two systems”, “now is not the right time to bring forward proposals for alignment between the two frameworks.”

This would mean that contractors operating inside IR35 – which means they pay the same levels of tax and national insurance as salaried employees – will not be granted the same employment rights as their permanent colleagues.

However, in the run-up to the Conservative leadership vote, which closes today (2 September), candidate Liz Truss pledged to review off-payroll regulations if she becomes the next Prime Minister.

In an interview with The Sun on Sunday last week, Truss said: “The changes that have been made to IR35 are all about trying to treat the self-employed the same as big business.

“But the fact is, if you’re self-employed, you don’t get the same benefits as being in a big company. You don’t get paid holidays, you don’t get those benefits. So the tax system should reflect that more.”

Seb Maley, CEO of IR35 insurance provider Qdos, said the government’s response to the PAC’s criticisms was “predictable”.

He said: “The Public Accounts Committee provided a damning assessment of IR35 reform, with the report calling on HMRC to make changes to these flawed rules.

“And while HMRC has agreed with the recommendations made, the tax office is merely promising to review and research these issues further.

“Ultimately, this response lacks a concrete promise to resolve several of the fundamental issues resulting directly from the introduction of IR35 reform – whether that’s to ensure contractors have a fair shot at overturning unfair IR35 determinations or to give businesses every chance to comply with the rules.

“It’s a disappointing – albeit predictable – response that we’ve seen far too often from the government whenever it’s pressed on IR35.”

One recommendation the government agreed to proceed with was that HMRC runs a cost-benefit analysis of introducing the reforms.

HMRC said it would investigate how much organisations had spent in order to comply with the reforms by December 2023.

It also conceded there had been “structural problems” with how the regulations work in practice, including obtaining the relevant data for worker status decisions, and committed to looking into this.

Dave Chaplin, CEO of tax compliance firm IR35 Shield, said the response included “both positives and negatives”.

“It is very disappointing to read in the opening paragraph a legally incorrect comment by Government when stating that disguised employees are ‘…people who do the same job in the same manner as an employee’. This is either ignorant of the law, a deliberate misrepresentation, or ironically highlights that Government doesn’t understand the complexities of status law,” he said.

“There is nothing in the common law on status that refers to ‘same job’ or ‘same manner’. Status law is concerned with the nature of how someone is engaged and seeks to ascertain whether it is a commercial agreement (for services) or employment (of service).

“If the test was as simple as needing to find someone else doing the same job in the same manner, then cases would not need to go to the Supreme Court, and neither would HMRC need to publish reams of guidance.”

Talent management opportunities on Personnel Today


Browse more talent management jobs

Jo Faragher
Jo Faragher

Jo Faragher has been an employment and business journalist for 20 years. She regularly contributes to Personnel Today and writes features for a number of national business and membership magazines. Jo is also the author of 'Good Work, Great Technology', published in 2022 by Clink Street Publishing, charting the relationship between effective workplace technology and productive and happy employees. She won the Willis Towers Watson HR journalist of the year award in 2015 and has been highly commended twice.

previous post
Why flexible working law fails new parents
next post
It’s time to move the goalposts on office speak

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

You may also like

Government responds to umbrella company call for evidence

6 Jun 2023

HMRC proposes change to address IR35 tax overpayments

28 Apr 2023

Gary Lineker case ‘nothing to do with IR35’...

3 Mar 2023

IR35 impact report ‘fails to tell the full...

16 Dec 2022

Top 10 HR questions October 2022: disciplinary witness...

1 Nov 2022

IR35: self-employed contractors have been ‘thrown under the...

17 Oct 2022

IR35 policy: It is time to stop ‘tearing...

17 Oct 2022

Hunt reverses tax cuts including repeal of IR35...

17 Oct 2022

Conservatives: Seven proposals that could impact HR

5 Oct 2022

HMRC umbrella company tax avoidance action is ‘a...

30 Sep 2022

  • Discover the value of CIPD accreditation PROMOTED | See how the CIPD can increase your earning potential...Read more
  • What does it mean to be an HR professional in 2024? (survey) PROMOTED | The world of HR is changing rapidly...Read more
  • The Contractor Management Mastery Pack: Everything you need to manage and pay global contractors PROMOTED | Answers to cross-border...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2023

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2023 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+