Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Case lawEnhanced payShared parental leaveMaternityLegal opinion

Shared parental pay: Is refusal to match enhanced maternity pay sex discrimination?

by Darren Newman 13 Jun 2017
by Darren Newman 13 Jun 2017 Was gender really the reason that Mr Ali was denied fully paid leave?
Stock photo
Was gender really the reason that Mr Ali was denied fully paid leave?
Stock photo

Consultant editor Darren Newman asks if an employment tribunal was correct to hold that it was direct sex discrimination for a new father to be allowed to take only two weeks’ leave on full pay, when female staff were entitled to 14 weeks’ enhanced maternity pay.

Is not enhancing shared parental pay sex discrimination?

Read Darren Newman’s perspective on XpertHR

Take part in our maternity and paternity pay survey

We need to be clear at the outset that the “problem” of sex discrimination in the workplace is essentially the problem of employers discriminating against women.

This is especially true around the issue of pregnancy and maternity where there is a wealth of evidence showing the career disadvantages suffered by women who take maternity leave.

We need to bear this in mind when looking at the case of Ali v Capita Customer Management, in which a male employee claimed direct sex discrimination because his employer refused to match the enhanced maternity pay given to women when he wanted to take shared parental leave. The case is important because, if the decision is upheld, it will have a profound effect on how employers approach maternity and shared parental leave.

Mr Ali’s wife had post-natal depression and had been advised to return to work in order to aid her recovery. He therefore wanted to take shared parental leave at the earliest possible opportunity. His employer’s policy was to pay women who took maternity leave their full salary for 14 weeks, after which they continued on statutory maternity pay for 25 weeks.

The employer in Mr Ali’s case would have treated the female partner of a woman who had given birth in exactly the same way. Sex was simply not the reason that Mr Ali’s request for enhanced pay was turned down”

For shared parental leave, however, the employer offered only the statutory minimum rate of pay. That meant that, once Mr Ali had taken two weeks of paternity leave (which was fully paid), any further leave he took would involve a substantial reduction in pay. He claimed that refusing to pay him the same as a mother taking maternity leave was direct sex discrimination – and the employment tribunal agreed.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Will that finding be upheld on appeal? My view is that this is unlikely, because of two main problems with the tribunal’s decision. First, it does not seem to me that sex was the reason that Mr Ali was denied fully paid leave.

Continue reading on XpertHR…

Darren Newman

Darren Newman qualified as a barrister in 1990, and has represented both employers and employees at tribunal. He provides straightforward practical guidance on a wide range of employment law issues through Darren Newman Employment Law.

previous post
Making the most of apprenticeships (webinar)
next post
Millennials: Is your employee experience relevant enough?

You may also like

Top 10 HR questions June 2025: Redundancy consultation

2 Jul 2025

Government launches ‘landmark’ review of parental leave

1 Jul 2025

Reforming paternity leave could benefit UK by £13bn...

30 Jun 2025

School’s bid to appeal Kristie Higgs ruling refused...

11 Jun 2025

Parental leave system is ‘broken’, say MPs

10 Jun 2025

Court rejects Liberty’s legal challenge against EHRC consultation

9 Jun 2025

US Supreme Court lowers burden of proof for...

6 Jun 2025

NDA ban vital to tackling misogyny in music...

4 Jun 2025

Liberty to challenge EHRC consultation in High Court

3 Jun 2025

Fire and rehire: the relocation question

22 May 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+