Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Civil ServiceEmployment lawLatest NewsEconomics, government & businessRedundancy

Judicial review of Civil Service redundancy pay cuts expected in March

by Kat Baker 18 Jan 2010
by Kat Baker 18 Jan 2010

A judicial review of the government’s proposed cuts to Whitehall redundancy packages is on track to reach the High Court as early as March, unions have said.


The Public Commercial Services union (PCS), the FDA and Prospect announced in December they would seek a judicial review of the government’s plans to cut the Civil Service Compensation Scheme (CSCS) ahead of an expected wave of Whitehall job cuts.


Under the changes intended to take effect on 1 April, the government will cap Whitehall severance pay at a maximum of two years’ salary for employees earning £25,000 or more – civil servants who have worked in Whitehall for 20 years are currently entitled to three years’ pay – while people who rejoin the Civil Service after receiving a severance payment will be required to pay some of the money back.


Unions are confident the judicial review – sought partly because unions claim the government failed to consult with them over the changes – will take place unless the government agrees to negotiate with unions.


A PCS spokesman told Personnel Today: “Effectively what will happen is the judicial review will kick in once the government lays the order before parliament. We are looking at that happening in March.


“We anticipate that it will be quite swift. We are working with our solicitors and the other unions in terms of formulating our argument.”


The unions are seeking judicial review over the government’s decision not to consult unions over the changes, and to implement the changes with only an order in parliament – not an act of parliament, which would require debate on the changes and a vote in favour of their implementation.


Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

The spokesman added talks with the government over the changes were scheduled to take place “over the next few weeks” to attempt to find a resolution to the dispute. “We hope we can reach a negotiated, solid settlement there,” he said.


Meanwhile the PCS union is to begin a ballot for industrial action on 4 February over the proposed CSCS changes. A statement on the body’s website said: “The government’s proposed changes to the CSCS would make job cuts cheaper at a time when we know that all the main political parties are planning huge public spending cuts. All members would be at greater risk of redundancy.”

Kat Baker

previous post
Birmingham City Council to cut almost 1,300 jobs
next post
Employment law breathing space needed to cut business costs

You may also like

MPs reject Lords’ amendments to Employment Rights Bill

16 Sep 2025

Failure to prevent fraud: Only 29% training staff...

16 Sep 2025

Scottish government funds furlough for bus manufacturer

16 Sep 2025

Which employers offer equal parental leave?

16 Sep 2025

Google to create 8,250 AI jobs as part...

16 Sep 2025

‘The spotlight on AI skills risks creating an...

16 Sep 2025

Jobs market continuing to stagnate, says official data

16 Sep 2025

Call for a national OH service to tackle...

16 Sep 2025

Right to request flexible working has had limited...

16 Sep 2025

Staff prioritise work-life balance and boundaries – research

16 Sep 2025

  • Workplace health benefits need to be simplified SPONSORED | Long-term sickness...Read more
  • Work smart – stay well: Avoid unnecessary pain with centred ergonomics SPONSORED | If you often notice...Read more
  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits Live
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise